depends on the model. on ASUS W790 Ace & SAGE QYFP,QYFQ,QYFS.... support overclocking
and works with Kingston Renegade Pro DDR5-6000
...memory copatibility is more BIOS thing, should fine if you can run latest BIOS.
ES Xeon Discussion
- Thread starter britinpdx
- Start date
Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.
and works with Kingston Renegade Pro DDR5-6000
...memory copatibility is more BIOS thing, should fine if you can run latest BIOS.
Decided to google again for memory related performance tests, I've compared Conjugate Gradient benchmark (sensitive to cache and memory, but not sure where it's bottlenecking between those two) from results pictured here:
CPU/Score (core/threads/Base Ghz)
8380 1P = 20.65 (40/80/2.3)
8280 2P = 28.98 (28/56/2.7 x2)
8490H 1P = 31.24 (60/120/1.9)
8592+ 1P = 35.42 (64/128/1.9)
8380 2P = 40.31 (40/80/2.3 x2)
8490H 2P = 60.42 (60/120/1.9 x2)
8592+ 2P = 70.95 (64/128/1.9 x2)
And it feels like if we check performance adjusted for core counts and memory frequencies - results attributable to better memory (channels, frequencies, DDR4toDDR5) aren't revolutionary different, even arriving to a conclusion what personally to me further investment into neither Sapphire nor Emerald Rapids are not even close to be justifiable at current ebay prices (despite Prod stepping QS and $ being multiples below Intel's advised prices), I mean I have it already for back then affordable price but won't be upgrading in near time to Dual-socket variant.
but seeing as there's recurring talk about buying ES Xeons for ML/GPU workstations, still a valid point I feel
What about the compatibility of: QY08, 8468, ES CPU, 1.9GHZ, 3.3GHz, x 40, 48C/96T?
Would it be compatible with asus W790? I asked the ebay seller and they told me not compatible.
So is this another exception, or maybe the seller is just not sure and to honest?
Current ebay sellers block the TDP of QY08 in their screenshots and only mention it runs on 350W supporting mainboard.
I saw mentions of higher TDP's for some 4677 processor like 385W.
Can anyone confirm the TDP of QY08?
Last edited:
dual QYFS D0 ES2 350W runs on MS73-HB2 (datasheet: officialy supports 2x 270W)
Last edited:
simply yes. ASUS W790 does not block any TDP, it is an OC board.
you see on the CPU-Z shot the seller runs two QY08 on a dual socket board. chn. mostly use Gigabyte MS73 or SM X13DEI.
some D0 ES2 freeze on windows/linux loader:
this solves the issue.
set CPU C-states to enabled(def.=auto) only then next options comes visible.
and set Package C-State to C2(or C0/C1)
please do not get me wrong:
This is important information/discussion, it would just get lost here, no one will find it.
better to move to a specialized thread.
Besides the usual suspects from GIGABYTE MS03-CE0, MS73-HB1 and HB0.
There are now also newer boards, MW83-RP0, and updates like MS03-6L0 and MS73-HB2.
My question is does GIGABYTE maintain compatibility with D0 and other ES stepping that they previously supported also in their newer boards and BIOS?
There are now also newer boards, MW83-RP0, and updates like MS03-6L0 and MS73-HB2.
My question is does GIGABYTE maintain compatibility with D0 and other ES stepping that they previously supported also in their newer boards and BIOS?
Another question is about the P-cores and E-Cores. Official intel specs, list different frequencies for the e-cores and p-cores, and for most of the discussed Xeon cpu's here 16 p-cores are stated. While users also often speak about all-core boost/turbo. Not really differentiating, between the different types of cores. Does it mean that the difference is just not that visible?
For the normal 1700 socket intels for some applications, performance gains can be obtained, by disabling the efficiency 'e-cores', in the bios. Giving more power/cooling to the 'p-cores', enabling higher clocks. In an earlier post in this thread (here) , i RolloZ that disabled cores in the ES versions of Ice-lake based Xeons. Did anyone here try such things on the Sapphire Rapids ES Xeons?
For the normal 1700 socket intels for some applications, performance gains can be obtained, by disabling the efficiency 'e-cores', in the bios. Giving more power/cooling to the 'p-cores', enabling higher clocks. In an earlier post in this thread (here) , i RolloZ that disabled cores in the ES versions of Ice-lake based Xeons. Did anyone here try such things on the Sapphire Rapids ES Xeons?
ice lake, sapphire rapids and emerald rapids have only P cores, no E-cores here.
maybe you refer to Intel SST-BF ?
it is the same. if you disable half of the cores, the remaining can boost to max. turbo.
I am not doubting your expertize but, for example on the intel website with specs of the 8470 i see:
I thought that these low and high priority cores were similar as the 'p' and 'e' cores? Also it looks like they should have different frequencies. But maybe/probably i am wrong. Maybe only the base frequencies are different but the boost frequencies the same.
this is Intel SST-BF ( Intel® Speed Select-Technology - Base frequency )
you can configure OS to send high priorised workload to High Priority cores, and let the low Priority cores do background services i.e.
this is NOT the default. you have to enable SST-BF in BIOS and use compatible OS.
this is NOT the default. you have to enable SST-BF in BIOS and use compatible OS.
