I could really use some help navigating Intel ES / QS stuff. I have some AMD ones from rome generation (ZS17, '-04's). Some of my questions might come from context of my AMD experience and none with Intel ES/QS.
I'm interested in 8375C I'm seeing on ebay, I'm seeing a lot of models all under this one umbrella of a name which I realize is probably just an approximation.
ES:
QVLS: Intel platinum 8375c/8362 ES qvls 32c 2.7ghz 3.6/3.6ghz 54mb 300w lga4189 CPU | eBay
QVLP: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C ES QVLP 32C 2.8GHz 3.5/3.5GHz 54MB 300W LGA4189 | eBay
QS:
QWLQ Intel xeon Platinum 8375C QS CPU 32 core 2.9G server processor QWLQ CPU LGA4189 | eBay
QXDA: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C QS QXDA 32C 2.9GHz 3.5GHz 54MB 300W LGA4189 | eBay Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C QS 32-Core 2.80-3.50GHz 330W LGA-4189 CPU Processor | eBay
Non-ES-QS
SRKHA: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C 32-Core 2.90GHz 300W LGA-4189 CPU Processor Non-QS/ES | eBay
SRKUS...
First regarding speeds. the Rome CPUs need overclocking or run at rather low speeds, particularly the ES (ZS17 / ZS14). How does speed vary from ES to QS to final in Intel land? They all list 3.5/3.6 GHz turbo, but I know Intel has rather complex frequency tables for active cores vs instruction set. I don't expect exact answers, maybe just anecdote or extrapolation from skylake?
Other aspects of the CPU can lag behind sometimes. Like on the ZS rome CPUs the infinity fabric is slow. Would I expect issues with memory controller, cache, etc. on these Intels?
How do these show up to the system / OS? Like the first QXDA link is showing 8375C in windows, in cinebench, in hwinfo, but upon closer inspection it looks like SRKHA screenshots, so I don't trust the screenshots. The second link shows QXDA in hwinfo and Intel CPU 0000%, which seems more reliable. Of course it also shows the current frequency as 4.3 GHz so...still probably doctored?
If I went with QS, would I expect near "final" speeds and compatibility, but just have a strange name? I'd be able to update bios though and have more board selection?
I know the ES will be stuck on some old bios on specific boards only, but should it get near final performance?
Any words of warning I should know?
And lastly, has anyone touched ice lake ES/QS?
Any insight at all is appreciated.
Thanks
I'm interested in 8375C I'm seeing on ebay, I'm seeing a lot of models all under this one umbrella of a name which I realize is probably just an approximation.
ES:
QVLS: Intel platinum 8375c/8362 ES qvls 32c 2.7ghz 3.6/3.6ghz 54mb 300w lga4189 CPU | eBay
QVLP: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C ES QVLP 32C 2.8GHz 3.5/3.5GHz 54MB 300W LGA4189 | eBay
QS:
QWLQ Intel xeon Platinum 8375C QS CPU 32 core 2.9G server processor QWLQ CPU LGA4189 | eBay
QXDA: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C QS QXDA 32C 2.9GHz 3.5GHz 54MB 300W LGA4189 | eBay Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C QS 32-Core 2.80-3.50GHz 330W LGA-4189 CPU Processor | eBay
Non-ES-QS
SRKHA: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C 32-Core 2.90GHz 300W LGA-4189 CPU Processor Non-QS/ES | eBay
SRKUS...
First regarding speeds. the Rome CPUs need overclocking or run at rather low speeds, particularly the ES (ZS17 / ZS14). How does speed vary from ES to QS to final in Intel land? They all list 3.5/3.6 GHz turbo, but I know Intel has rather complex frequency tables for active cores vs instruction set. I don't expect exact answers, maybe just anecdote or extrapolation from skylake?
Other aspects of the CPU can lag behind sometimes. Like on the ZS rome CPUs the infinity fabric is slow. Would I expect issues with memory controller, cache, etc. on these Intels?
How do these show up to the system / OS? Like the first QXDA link is showing 8375C in windows, in cinebench, in hwinfo, but upon closer inspection it looks like SRKHA screenshots, so I don't trust the screenshots. The second link shows QXDA in hwinfo and Intel CPU 0000%, which seems more reliable. Of course it also shows the current frequency as 4.3 GHz so...still probably doctored?
If I went with QS, would I expect near "final" speeds and compatibility, but just have a strange name? I'd be able to update bios though and have more board selection?
I know the ES will be stuck on some old bios on specific boards only, but should it get near final performance?
Any words of warning I should know?
And lastly, has anyone touched ice lake ES/QS?
Any insight at all is appreciated.
Thanks






