Arista DCS-7050QX-32

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.
B

bobbyd

New Member
Feb 12, 2020
4
1
1
VMman said:
I'd like to know if its possible to use non-arista DAC's from FS like the generic ones or Mellanox to save a few $?

I understand there was two methods to allow 3rd party DAC's however I can't find a definitive answer in this thread so I'm posted again.

I would like to use these for a Lab with some Chelsio T580 cards, does anybody have experience is this is reported working?
Click to expand...
What kind of DAC cable? 10G, 25G, etc? I'm not sure what @pjackson issue was. I think DACs are different from SFPs and they might need to be Arista coded. My assumption is if you get those ones from Fiberstore you should be ok. FS is pretty good about RMAing if they don't work but you'll just be out of your time. If you have the "service unsupported-transceiver" command you should be set also but that may not apply to DACs because of how DACs work.

Also it could be as simple as pjackson plugged the DACs in before he issued that command, in which case you just need to re-insert.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nedimzukic2
A

alex.forencich

Member
Jul 19, 2020
51
20
8
VMman said:
I'd like to know if its possible to use non-arista DAC's from FS like the generic ones or Mellanox to save a few $?

I understand there was two methods to allow 3rd party DAC's however I can't find a definitive answer in this thread so I'm posted again.

I would like to use these for a Lab with some Chelsio T580 cards, does anybody have experience is this is reported working?
Click to expand...
FS-coded QSFP28 DACs work fine. At least, I'm pretty sure we got FS-coded DACs, trying to confirm that now. The switches are picky about non-Arista optical modules, but I think DACs are fine. The ones from Mellanox definitely work fine.
 
F

ferrao

New Member
Jan 16, 2021
4
5
3
Anyone had success updating the switch up to 4.23.5?

Code: 
localhost(config)#boot system flash:/EOS-2GB-4.23.5M-INT.swi 
% Software image flash:/EOS-2GB-4.23.5M-INT.swi is not compatible on this hardware
 
A

alex.forencich

Member
Jul 19, 2020
51
20
8
I have heard mixed things about the 2GB firmware. Have you tried the non-2GB firmware to see if that works on your switch?
 
Last edited:
funkywizard

funkywizard

mmm.... bandwidth.
Jan 15, 2017
849
402
63
USA
ioflood.com
ferrao said:
Anyone had success updating the switch up to 4.23.5?

Code: 
localhost(config)#boot system flash:/EOS-2GB-4.23.5M-INT.swi
% Software image flash:/EOS-2GB-4.23.5M-INT.swi is not compatible on this hardware
Click to expand...
We're using 4.23.1F 64 bit, according to my staff.

I'm told the 2GB model is only needed on the "non-S" revision of 7050QX-32. For the 7050QX-32S you should use the normal images.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nedimzukic2
F

ferrao

New Member
Jan 16, 2021
4
5
3
alex.forencich said:
I have heard mixed things about the 2GB firmware. Have you tried the non-2GB firmware to see if that works on the 7050QX?
Click to expand...
It's strange, I've tried the 4.22 branch without success either:

Code: 
localhost(config)#boot system flash:/EOS-2GB-4.22.1F-INT.swi
% Software image flash:/EOS-2GB-4.22.1F-INT.swi is not compatible on this hardware
I'll try with the normal images and report back.
 
F

ferrao

New Member
Jan 16, 2021
4
5
3
funkywizard said:
We're using 4.23.1F 64 bit, according to my staff.

I'm told the 2GB model is only needed on the "non-S" revision of 7050QX-32. For the 7050QX-32S you should use the normal images.
Click to expand...
Nice to hear... can I use the EOS64 images? There's EOS64-4.25.1F.swi available.

EDIT: I'm an idiot, you already said that you're using the 64bit release.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard Sanchez
A

alex.forencich

Member
Jul 19, 2020
51
20
8
ferrao said:
It's strange, I've tried the 4.22 branch without success either:

Code: 
localhost(config)#boot system flash:/EOS-2GB-4.22.1F-INT.swi
% Software image flash:/EOS-2GB-4.22.1F-INT.swi is not compatible on this hardware
I'll try with the normal images and report back.
Click to expand...
Well, that's also the 2GB image. Specifically which switch do you have?
 
F

ferrao

New Member
Jan 16, 2021
4
5
3
Thanks @funkywizard and @alex.forencich it worked:

Code: 
localhost>sh version
Arista DCS-7050QX-32S-F
Hardware version: 11.34
Serial number: XXXXXXXXXXX
Hardware MAC address: xxxx.xxxx.f28d
System MAC address: xxxx.xxxx.f28d
Software image version: 4.25.1F
Architecture: x86_64
Internal build version: 4.25.1F-20005270.4251F
Internal build ID: fd5fd650-197c-40e5-b48c-b1e60cd70826
Uptime: 0 weeks, 0 days, 0 hours and 4 minutes
Total memory: 3990988 kB
Free memory: 2362644 kB
 
  • Like
Reactions: linuxmanbg, RedX1, nedimzukic2 and 1 other person
A

alex.forencich

Member
Jul 19, 2020
51
20
8
Ha, I was just about to post exactly the same thing, as I just updated both of my switches to 4.25.1F, one 7060CX-32S and one 7050QX-32S, both with the EOS64-4.25.1F image.

Code: 
arista>show version
Arista DCS-7060CX-32S-R
Hardware version: 12.00
Serial number: ***********
Hardware MAC address: ****.****.****
System MAC address: ****.****.****

Software image version: 4.25.1F
Architecture: x86_64
Internal build version: 4.25.1F-20005270.4251F
Internal build ID: fd5fd650-197c-40e5-b48c-b1e60cd70826

Uptime: 0 weeks, 0 days, 0 hours and 6 minutes
Code: 
localhost>show version
Arista DCS-7050QX-32S-F
Hardware version: 21.32
Serial number: ***********
Hardware MAC address: ****.****.****
System MAC address: ****.****.****

Software image version: 4.25.1F
Architecture: x86_64
Internal build version: 4.25.1F-20005270.4251F
Internal build ID: fd5fd650-197c-40e5-b48c-b1e60cd70826

Uptime: 0 weeks, 0 days, 0 hours and 4 minutes
Incidentally, it also appears that the 2GB images are now EOL, see: End of software support for 7050QX-32 series - Arista . So that means the 7050QX-32 (no S) will no longer receive firmware updates, but the 7050QX-32S is still supported with the non-2GB images.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Richard Sanchez, nedimzukic2, nate.hancock and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom