What liars?
They are crystal clear to you that those are QLC, which means they perform exactly like QLC -- fast when write cache is empty, slow when cache is full.
EVOs are TLC, which means they perform exactly like TLC -- fast when write cache is empty, slow when cache is full, but not as slow as QLC.
QLC is WELL KNOWN for lightweight IO, and extensive IO requires high end TLC or even MLC or SLC drives.
My Crucial P1 QLC drive writes at 1500MB/s at the beginning, and 80MB/s after cache is full, which exactly meets consumer use cases.
One of friends put that 870 QVO into a server. I had a chance to use that server. A simple apt-get upgrade takes 10X time compared to a normal TLC SSD.
They are crystal clear to you that those are QLC, which means they perform exactly like QLC -- fast when write cache is empty, slow when cache is full.
EVOs are TLC, which means they perform exactly like TLC -- fast when write cache is empty, slow when cache is full, but not as slow as QLC.
QLC is WELL KNOWN for lightweight IO, and extensive IO requires high end TLC or even MLC or SLC drives.
My Crucial P1 QLC drive writes at 1500MB/s at the beginning, and 80MB/s after cache is full, which exactly meets consumer use cases.
One of friends put that 870 QVO into a server. I had a chance to use that server. A simple apt-get upgrade takes 10X time compared to a normal TLC SSD.