Topton Jasper Lake Quad i225V Mini PC Report

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

icecrash

New Member
Jan 19, 2023
6
7
3
Seems a similar case as in the CWWK Alder Lake series. The Case gets pretty good reviews in this thread. Would be nice to know if the case has heatpipes as its bigger brother (probably not). I'll wait until CWWK has this case in their store and ask them about.
There are two CWWK stores that I have been able to find on AliExpress:

CWWK Store: Does not have any in stock yet. Edit: It's out now: https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256805224985835.html
CWWK PC Store: https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256805196863332.html
I'm not sure which is supposed to be the "good" CWWK store, maybe they both are OK?

I'd be curious to know which design would have the best thermals:
(A) The shorter one with holes on the side (TOPTON).


(B) The taller one with no holes on the side (YSJMNPC). [EDIT: Probably better to get the one from CWWK]
(B)
The taller one with no holes on the side (CWWK)


(C) The less tall one with no holes on the side (CWWK).




Interestingly enough, CWWK's news article shows the Topton-style design (A), but it is not on their store yet:

 
Last edited:

Iko

New Member
Apr 1, 2023
5
4
3
Phew, this is an epic thread, thank you to everyone who has contributed! It has taken numerous sittings to get through, but totally worth it because I am looking at these types of boxes on Aliexpress and wondering about the options I mention further below. I wonder if anyone has any comments to help me make an informed choice? I want to use a 4-port device primarily as a home firewall and a VPN client, but with whatever additional security functions are useful as I learn more about all this. Additionally, it would be nice if the thing is able to be repurposed for other modest home network uses in a few years rather than just becoming junk because it's too slow.

Candidates are:
* N5100 for US$113 (or N5105 for $127);
* 7505U for $163
* N95 for $215 (or N100 for $225)

A crowdsourced comparison chart is also below. Since the brand new N95 & N100 devices are almost double the cost of the cheap N5XX ones, while only bringing a modest increase in performance (although they ought to create less heat being a smaller fab?), it seems like they may not be worth the extra cost for me yet, especially if DDR5 ram is still expensive. But the old-time 7505U basically splits the difference price-wise, while having performance almost as good as the N95. I am a bit suspicious though as it is an obscure CPU and doesn't appear in these device specs very often. Also I am wondering, since it has only two real cores, and uses those to make 4 'hyperthreads' -- will these kinds of firewall applications do very well in such an environment, or would four slower 'real' cores do just about as well in practice? In which case the popular N5XX would seem the best choice?

Intel-Celeron-N5100-1-10GHz-vs-Intel-Celeron-N5105-2-00GHz-vs-Intel-Pentium-Gold-7505-2-00GHz-...png
 

T.Sharp

Member
Oct 22, 2022
54
91
18
@Iko the benchmark results for the N510x aren't very accurate since it's an average of many devices with varying power limits. With the router boxes, the power limit is unlocked, and all cores can boost to what would typically be the max single core boost clock. The N5100 scores 4400 if it's not hitting power limit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iko

DomFel

Member
Sep 5, 2022
77
74
18
Also I am wondering, since it has only two real cores, and uses those to make 4 'hyperthreads' -- will these kinds of firewall applications do very well in such an environment, or would four slower 'real' cores do just about as well in practice? In which case the popular N5XX would seem the best choice?
I wish the 7505 was available when I bought mines. 2 REAL cores are definitely better than 1 physical core, and the linux kernel will manage them just fine. Just go for the 7505.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iko

Becks0815

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2022
241
337
63
There are two CWWK stores that I have been able to find on AliExpress:

CWWK Store: Does not have any in stock yet.
CWWK PC Store: https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256805196863332.html
I'm not sure which is supposed to be the "good" CWWK store, maybe they both are OK?

I'd be curious to know which design would have the best thermals:
(A) The shorter one with holes on the side (TOPTON).


(B) The taller one with no holes on the side (YSJMNPC).
Small detail, but relevant: Topton also has an I3 router with this taller case - but here you can see heat pipes, which is not the case for the YSJMNPC version. So the thermals of the shorter one with the holes (which was the best one for the N5105 series) also might be the best for the N100 series. However with a 6W TDP instead of 10W TDP the generated heat should be less a problem, which in the end results for me in waiting for CWWK to present their version of the N100 on their own web page
 

Iko

New Member
Apr 1, 2023
5
4
3
I wish the 7505 was available when I bought mines. 2 REAL cores are definitely better than 1 physical core, and the linux kernel will manage them just fine. Just go for the 7505.
Thanks @T.Sharp & @DomFel for your replies. I don't understand the distinction between 'physical' cores and 'real' cores, but come to think of it I've heard OpenVPN is limited to a single thread, so I guess the 7505 with its higher single thread speed should do well with that task. The whole reason I began looking at buying a firewall box is that my Asus RT-AC68U runs OpenVPN client at a snails pace, and it seemed hardly worth paying hundreds and hundreds to upgrade it just for that, when it still serves wifi just fine.

I found a reddit thread where someone asks a similar question in connection with OPNsense: "How is Pentium Gold 7505 better than Celeron N5105?" but noone with any actual experience with it has commented there.
 

andrea87

Active Member
Oct 15, 2022
87
100
33
37
North-east Italy
I own one of the pentium 7505 boxes.

In my experience, with the boost TDP tuned properly, I can get all two cores to boost permanently to 3.4 GHz for an almost indefinite time. With a 120mm fan running at 5V, during these tests the worst I've seen is 55°C on the cpu.

My machine is currently running "idle" at 8% cpu load (proxmox, OPNsense, Ubuntu Server, Home Assistant + InfluxDB and Grafana). I've ran a few test with from the proxmox's console both with sysbench and stress-NG and these are the results:

Number of threads: 1
Initializing random number generator from current time

Prime numbers limit: 10000

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

CPU speed:
events per second: 2505.85

General statistics:
total time: 10.0002s
total number of events: 25063

Latency (ms):
min: 0.33
avg: 0.40
max: 3.94
95th percentile: 0.35
sum: 9992.34

Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 25063.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 9.9923/0.00
Number of threads: 2
Initializing random number generator from current time


Prime numbers limit: 10000

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

CPU speed:
events per second: 4859.07

General statistics:
total time: 10.0003s
total number of events: 48600

Latency (ms):
min: 0.34
avg: 0.41
max: 4.60
95th percentile: 0.36
sum: 19986.04

Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 24300.0000/4421.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 9.9930/0.00
Number of threads: 4
Initializing random number generator from current time

Prime numbers limit: 10000

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

CPU speed:
events per second: 6091.57

General statistics:
total time: 10.0005s
total number of events: 60977

Latency (ms):
min: 0.34
avg: 0.66
max: 28.66
95th percentile: 0.68
sum: 39985.38

Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 15244.2500/178.57
execution time (avg/stddev): 9.9963/0.00
root@MiniPC:~# stress-ng --cpu 1 --cpu-method matrixprod --metrics-brief --perf -t 60
stress-ng: info: [293701] dispatching hogs: 1 cpu
stress-ng: info: [293701] successful run completed in 61.41s (1 min, 1.41 secs)
stress-ng: info: [293701] stressor bogo ops real time usr time sys time bogo ops/s bogo ops/s
stress-ng: info: [293701] (secs) (secs) (secs) (real time) (usr+sys time)
stress-ng: info: [293701] cpu 22872 61.41 59.93 0.01 372.45 381.58
stress-ng: info: [293701] cpu:
stress-ng: info: [293701] 196 Page Faults User 3.19 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 1 Page Faults Kernel 0.02 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 79 System Call Enter 1.29 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 78 System Call Exit 1.27 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 7 Kmalloc 0.11 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 51 Kfree 0.83 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 265 Kmem Cache Alloc 4.32 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 1,639 Kmem Cache Free 26.69 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 242 MM Page Alloc 3.94 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 15 MM Page Free 0.24 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 35,178 RCU Utilization 572.82 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 997 Sched Migrate Task 16.23 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 Sched Move NUMA 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 1,151 Sched Wakeup 18.74 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 Sched Proc Exec 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 Sched Proc Exit 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 Sched Proc Fork 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 4 Sched Proc Free 0.07 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 Sched Proc Hang 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 Sched Proc Wait 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 1,512 Sched Switch 24.62 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 3 Signal Generate 0.05 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 1 Signal Deliver 0.02 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 943 IRQ Entry 15.36 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 943 IRQ Exit 15.36 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 4,174 Soft IRQ Entry 67.97 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 4,174 Soft IRQ Exit 67.97 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 1 Writeback Dirty Inode 0.02 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 Migrate MM Pages 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 110 SKB Consume 1.79 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 224 SKB Kfree 3.65 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 IOMMU IO Page Fault 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 IOMMU Map 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 IOMMU Unmap 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 Filemap page-cache add 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 Filemap page-cache del 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 OOM Compact Retry 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 OOM Wake Reaper 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [293701] 0 Thermal Zone Trip 0.00 /sec
root@MiniPC:~# stress-ng --cpu 2 --cpu-method matrixprod --metrics-brief --perf -t 60
stress-ng: info: [294052] dispatching hogs: 2 cpu
stress-ng: info: [294052] successful run completed in 61.44s (1 min, 1.44 secs)
stress-ng: info: [294052] stressor bogo ops real time usr time sys time bogo ops/s bogo ops/s
stress-ng: info: [294052] (secs) (secs) (secs) (real time) (usr+sys time)
stress-ng: info: [294052] cpu 40526 60.72 119.64 0.04 667.45 338.62
stress-ng: info: [294052] cpu:
stress-ng: info: [294052] 392 Page Faults User 6.38 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 2 Page Faults Kernel 0.03 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 158 System Call Enter 2.57 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 156 System Call Exit 2.54 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 10 Kmalloc 0.16 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 346 Kfree 5.63 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 638 Kmem Cache Alloc 10.38 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 5,048 Kmem Cache Free 82.17 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 462 MM Page Alloc 7.52 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 34 MM Page Free 0.55 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 70,360 RCU Utilization 1.15 K/sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 2,208 Sched Migrate Task 35.94 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 Sched Move NUMA 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 2,996 Sched Wakeup 48.77 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 Sched Proc Exec 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 Sched Proc Exit 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 Sched Proc Fork 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 44 Sched Proc Free 0.72 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 Sched Proc Hang 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 Sched Proc Wait 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 3,144 Sched Switch 51.17 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 4 Signal Generate 0.07 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 2 Signal Deliver 0.03 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 4,730 IRQ Entry 76.99 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 4,730 IRQ Exit 76.99 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 9,052 Soft IRQ Entry 147.34 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 9,052 Soft IRQ Exit 147.34 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 Writeback Dirty Inode 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 Migrate MM Pages 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 134 SKB Consume 2.18 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 628 SKB Kfree 10.22 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 IOMMU IO Page Fault 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 IOMMU Map 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 IOMMU Unmap 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 Filemap page-cache add 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 Filemap page-cache del 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 OOM Compact Retry 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 OOM Wake Reaper 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294052] 0 Thermal Zone Trip 0.00 /sec
root@MiniPC:~# stress-ng --cpu 4 --cpu-method matrixprod --metrics-brief --perf -t 60
stress-ng: info: [294368] dispatching hogs: 4 cpu
stress-ng: info: [294368] successful run completed in 61.36s (1 min, 1.36 secs)
stress-ng: info: [294368] stressor bogo ops real time usr time sys time bogo ops/s bogo ops/s
stress-ng: info: [294368] (secs) (secs) (secs) (real time) (usr+sys time)
stress-ng: info: [294368] cpu 41468 60.34 228.41 0.31 687.23 181.30
stress-ng: info: [294368] cpu:
stress-ng: info: [294368] 784 Page Faults User 12.78 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 4 Page Faults Kernel 0.07 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 316 System Call Enter 5.15 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 312 System Call Exit 5.08 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 16 Kmalloc 0.26 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 1,692 Kfree 27.58 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 288 Kmem Cache Alloc 4.69 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 12,292 Kmem Cache Free 200.33 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 844 MM Page Alloc 13.76 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 292 MM Page Free 4.76 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 239,944 RCU Utilization 3.91 K/sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 632 Sched Migrate Task 10.30 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 Sched Move NUMA 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 51,052 Sched Wakeup 832.03 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 Sched Proc Exec 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 Sched Proc Exit 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 Sched Proc Fork 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 220 Sched Proc Free 3.59 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 Sched Proc Hang 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 Sched Proc Wait 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 57,868 Sched Switch 943.12 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 20 Signal Generate 0.33 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 4 Signal Deliver 0.07 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 6,192 IRQ Entry 100.92 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 6,192 IRQ Exit 100.92 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 14,940 Soft IRQ Entry 243.49 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 14,940 Soft IRQ Exit 243.49 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 4 Writeback Dirty Inode 0.07 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 Migrate MM Pages 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 184 SKB Consume 3.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 220 SKB Kfree 3.59 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 IOMMU IO Page Fault 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 IOMMU Map 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 IOMMU Unmap 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 Filemap page-cache add 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 Filemap page-cache del 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 OOM Compact Retry 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 OOM Wake Reaper 0.00 /sec
stress-ng: info: [294368] 0 Thermal Zone Trip 0.00 /sec

If anyone wants any other test run just drop me the package info and command. I'll gladly run them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobS and Iko

vincele6

New Member
Mar 6, 2023
9
4
3
Hi Iko, I just recently got a N5100 (like in your first link), it is running quite hot idling, but I've not tried to tune it for lower power though nor repaste the cpu. I think you should concentrate on the ones that have better casing with greater surface area.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iko

Iko

New Member
Apr 1, 2023
5
4
3
I own one of the pentium 7505 boxes.

In my experience, with the boost TDP tuned properly, I can get all two cores to boost permanently to 3.4 GHz for an almost indefinite time. With a 120mm fan running at 5V, during these tests the worst I've seen is 55°C on the cpu.
Ah great, thanks! Leaves just one question - I wonder if the fan they have incorporated runs flat out continuously or if the speed is managed by BIOS using PWM. If you have a 120mm fan, sounds like you're not using the one in this image. I would have preferred the heatsink intact with fan on top, frankly.11th-Gen-Intel-Mini-Fan-Router-4-Intel-I225-2-5g-Lan-I7-1165g7-I3-1115g4-2xddr4-Nvme-Celeron-N...png
 

andrea87

Active Member
Oct 15, 2022
87
100
33
37
North-east Italy
Ah great, thanks! Leaves just one question - I wonder if the fan they have incorporated runs flat out continuously or if the speed is managed by BIOS using PWM. If you have a 120mm fan, sounds like you're not using the one in this image. I would have preferred the heatsink intact with fan on top, frankly.
I bought my unit in october last year, so there was no fan inside the heatsink yet. I've added a 120mm fan (a spare I had around, silverstone SST-FN121p) with a 3d printed base on top of the unit, running constantly at 5V on an USB port. The fan doesn't draw much power at 5V, I would guess about 0.5W give or take. I get no useful data out of lsusb -v on the host OS.

The adapter model is available on thingiverse here.
 

Attachments

Iko

New Member
Apr 1, 2023
5
4
3
I've added a 120mm fan (a spare I had around, silverstone SST-FN121p) with a 3d printed base on top of the unit, running constantly at 5V on an USB port.
That's rather more elegant than the takeaway food tray on which I have mounted a 120mm fan for my Asus router! I found a video that gives a real look (as opposed to design image) of that new case -- they call it a "G31F" -- with the embedded fan, which they do claim is speed regulated. I am wondering whether there'd be any benefit in drilling three or four holes in the top of the case under the fan for it to draw a tiny draft through the case from some matching holes in the bottom to cool the ram & drive. Maybe not worth the extra dust entering..
 

andrea87

Active Member
Oct 15, 2022
87
100
33
37
North-east Italy
I would say do not drill the top of the case. The heatsink side houses the CPU and the four / six i225/226 NIC drivers, everything else (ram, ssd, nvme) is on the other side of the pcb facing the bottom of the unit. Once you add a fan, the heatsink works properly (look at it, it doesn't look to be designed to operate efficiently in an horizontal position) and doesn't bake everything inside under heavy loads.
With the fan running (inside a 9U network rack) on mine the cpu idles at 24-26°C with 19°C ambient temperature. My ssd (sata) is at 26°C.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Iko

icecrash

New Member
Jan 19, 2023
6
7
3
Looks like the official CWWK version is up on AliExpress finally!

The internal thermal design looks similar for both CWWK and Topton, but they have different case designs. It will be interesting to see which one performs better. (EDIT: I chatted with CWWK and they said the new design (without the holes on the side) should have better heat dissipation, about 5°C difference.)

CWWK


TOPTON


From reading the discussion from previous posters, it seems like the CWWK versions sometimes have better build quality compared to other sellers (e.g. TOPTON). It would be nice if we can get STH to review these (especially the new case design one from CWWK). :)
 
Last edited:

Mike9474593

Active Member
Aug 5, 2022
120
87
28
The internal thermal design looks similar for both CWWK and Topton, but they have different case designs. It will be interesting to see which one performs better.
The CWWK image you posted seems to be off, the finns do not match the other pictures on Ali. And also the next picture with the WiFi antennas is probably not correct (4 USB Ports in front, USB C, HDMI + DP in front). They even speak about two copper tubes. Asking myself what is true. I'll ask them about the cooling, they were always super helpful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Becks0815

whocarez

New Member
Aug 10, 2022
3
0
1
Hi,

I own a V4 N5105 from CWWK, upgrade with V5 Bios (the problem also occurs with V3 Bios), when NVME Lexar NM620 512GB is installed on slot near SATA port, computer doesn't recognize the NVME, when is installed in the slot near memory the NVME is recognized and boots.

Any idea of the problem?

PS: Photos aren't mine, only to visually aid

NOK Doesn't boot
View attachment 28012

OK Boot:

View attachment 28013
I replaced Lexar NVME with a WD BLUE SN570 , with this drive the system boots normaly.
 

Foxtrot

New Member
Apr 4, 2023
12
1
3
Hi,

I'm new here and just starting with this box:
Intel N5105 4x Intel i226 2.5G

Got it up and running tonight - still learning - and ran into an issue with one of the LAN ports.
ETH3 seems to be dead.
I can not see it in OPNsense or Proxmox.
It also does not start blinking when a LAN cable is plugged in, the other three do this just fine.

Is this a hardware issue, or something else?
Bios setting are back to default.

2x 16GB RAM, NVME and a SATA drive are installed.

Bios version: GF-1338NP-12-V14
 
Last edited:

andrea87

Active Member
Oct 15, 2022
87
100
33
37
North-east Italy
Looks like an hardware issue.

if you run lspci in the proxmox's console, what do you see? There should be four pci express nics listed at the end of the list.
 

efahl

New Member
Oct 17, 2022
12
14
3
US California
Yeah, definitely looks like a hardware issue. Mine shows all four, just like that first screenshot:
Code:
$ lspci
...
01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Sandisk Corp WD Blue SN550 NVMe SSD (rev 01)
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Device 125c (rev 04)
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Device 125c (rev 04)
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Device 125c (rev 04)
05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Device 125c (rev 04)
$
 

Foxtrot

New Member
Apr 4, 2023
12
1
3
I opened a case with Ali and connected the seller via chat. Not really usable like this for me. Want to run VM with OPNsense and need 3 port in there (passthrough). Plus the one for Proxmox.

Any experience how they react?

On a different note.
I can not see ondemand as a option for power management in Proxmox.
is this normal? Unit is @11W in ideal.
 
Last edited: