Where do you find step numbers ?which 8490H ES ?
8490H ES step 3 D0 QYFX = no ( or with unofficial BIOS 1.0 is full of bugs - you can't downgrade, needs soldering )
8490H ES step 4 E0 Q03J = yes.
Where do you find step numbers ?which 8490H ES ?
8490H ES step 3 D0 QYFX = no ( or with unofficial BIOS 1.0 is full of bugs - you can't downgrade, needs soldering )
8490H ES step 4 E0 Q03J = yes.
It would be interesting to look at the tests of the Cinebench and Aida 64 CPU QueenThanks !
i think this is ok , i will buy 2pcs today.
if it work i will post test resultsIt would be interesting to look at the tests of the Cinebench and Aida 64 CPU Queen
I'll be looking forward to itif it work i will post test results
I don’t quite understand, you mean, SM sells ES/QS of CPUim ordering this from smicro : SYS-221H-TNR | 2U | SuperServer | Products | Supermicro
look at the CPU-Z screenshot AVID-MEDIA has posted:Where do you find step numbers ?
Before I bought an QWAT-CPU,from a person from this forumim ordering this from smicro : SYS-221H-TNR | 2U | SuperServer | Products | Supermicro
no. where do you got this ? he want to buy the server from SM and run ES on it.I don’t quite understand, you mean, SM sells ES/QS of CPU
Just keep in mind, that unless ES/QS have same stepping as production version of CPU nobody will be able to guarantee you that it won't have grave bugs or that it would work reliably for any amount of time. E0 and E5 are differs by 5 minor revisions and there were bugs fixed between them, just nobody(?) figured out what they were or those who did have NDA signed with some one that prevents them from talking about that (in most big tech companies you probably would have people who seen the list of fixed bugs)After this i will buy cpu from ebay.
nobody expects early engineering samples to be free of bugs,while prod.units still have some.Just keep in mind, that unless ES/QS have same stepping as production version of CPU nobody will be able to guarantee you that it won't have grave bugs or that it would work reliably for any amount of time. E0 and E5 are differs by 5 minor revisions and there were bugs fixed between them, just nobody(?) figured out what they were or those who did have NDA signed with some one that prevents them from talking about that (in most big tech companies you probably would have people who seen the list of fixed bugs)
Yeah, I probably misunderstood what he meant. Sorry.those who buy such cannot afford a production unit.
understand, such thing's like 1044 days AMD EPYC timer bug LOL. sorry, couldn't resist.they should prepare for all kind of problems.
Your. Or like Avoton's AVR54 bug. Just with early ES - more than usual, probablyunderstand, such thing's like 1044 days AMD EPYC timer bug LOL. sorry, couldn't resist.
remember TSX bug in prod. Xeon E5 Haswell-EP ?Your. Or like Avoton's AVR54 bug. Just with early ES - more than usual, probably![]()
Haswell and Haswell-EP I think, but yeah. Luckily it was not used that much.remember TSX bug in prod. Xeon E5 Haswell-EP ?
desktop don't support TSX thought. used and found the bug 3 month after launch, then disabled by MCU.Haswell and Haswell-EP I think, but yeah. Luckily it was not used that much.
Then I misremember that. I though there was some desktop or laptop CPU that also got it disabled because of the bug.desktop don't support TSX thought.