Hello
I currently have an Asus P8C-WS with an Ivy Bridge E3-1245 v2 Xeon. It is currently serving as a hackintosh. No sleep, no hibernate, must be forced to power off. But otherwise quite nice. It has 24 GB ECC RAM, but OS X has no MCE support for the chipset. Has seen very little use since last summer.
There is also a SuperMicro X10SLH-F with a Haswell refresh E3-1231 v3 Xeon. It is currently a NAS with 16 GB ECC RAM and some mirrored storage, not used for anything CPU-intensive.
I run a Gigabyte motherboard and a Skylake i3 as my current desktop (a hackintosh). There is also a Sandy Bridge 2011 Mac Mini (2 cores, 4 threads) with 8 GB RAM that is a small (pathetic / cute) ESXi server.
It would be wonderful to end up with 1) an ESXi server with ECC RAM, slightly more powerful than the Mac Mini, although a 8 core Xeon D would be overkill, 4 cores would be just fine. Any other Xeon will do if the idle power consumption stays equally low. And 2) a NAS with as small power consumption as possible. There is no good way to run any demanding virtualization under FreeNAS and I don't like the idea of ESXi hosting FreeNAS. I would get the Pentium D 1508 for this if I did not already have something else.
Q1: How does the idle power consumption of yesteryear's E3 Xeons compare to Xeon D?
Then 3) a Xeon workstation with ECC RAM (and therefore probably linux as the main OS). Question is, should I somehow rearrange my current machines? Make the Haswell SuperMicro into an ESXi server, the Ivy Asus into a workstation and get the Pentium D for the NAS?
Q2: How serious is the Asus P8C WS as a workstation motherboard?
I have heard that some consider it basically a joke. But I got it because there was a good chance to get it working as a hackintosh, although the ECC RAM support never materialized. SuperMicro would have been a bit more expensive and not as easy for a hackintosh.
Q3: If one were to start from scratch, what would / should / could he buy for a basic linux workstation?
By saying basic, I mean either a Xeon E3 (4 cores) or a single socket E5 (4 or 6 cores) or a dual socket E5 (4 + 4 cores). Would start with 32 GB RAM, must be able to expand to 64 GB, whereas 128 GB support is nice but not mandatory. Am I better served by the older models or Xeon W or any of this valuable metal stuff (Bronze / Silver / Gold)? Or something from AMD?
I don't expect anyone to go and hunt for answers for me. But if someone has already found out answers for these, I think many others would be served by them too.
I am a student with low income and some savings. That forces me to juggle these a bit.
Q4: Should everyone always go for Xeon D for NAS or ESXi, or could an E3 Xeon be a total win (i.e. no downsides at all) in some situations?
Q5: What about E5-1620 over E3-1230?
Q6: Any better choice for a single E5 Haswell / Broadwell workstation than X10SRA-F?
I currently have an Asus P8C-WS with an Ivy Bridge E3-1245 v2 Xeon. It is currently serving as a hackintosh. No sleep, no hibernate, must be forced to power off. But otherwise quite nice. It has 24 GB ECC RAM, but OS X has no MCE support for the chipset. Has seen very little use since last summer.
There is also a SuperMicro X10SLH-F with a Haswell refresh E3-1231 v3 Xeon. It is currently a NAS with 16 GB ECC RAM and some mirrored storage, not used for anything CPU-intensive.
I run a Gigabyte motherboard and a Skylake i3 as my current desktop (a hackintosh). There is also a Sandy Bridge 2011 Mac Mini (2 cores, 4 threads) with 8 GB RAM that is a small (pathetic / cute) ESXi server.
It would be wonderful to end up with 1) an ESXi server with ECC RAM, slightly more powerful than the Mac Mini, although a 8 core Xeon D would be overkill, 4 cores would be just fine. Any other Xeon will do if the idle power consumption stays equally low. And 2) a NAS with as small power consumption as possible. There is no good way to run any demanding virtualization under FreeNAS and I don't like the idea of ESXi hosting FreeNAS. I would get the Pentium D 1508 for this if I did not already have something else.
Q1: How does the idle power consumption of yesteryear's E3 Xeons compare to Xeon D?
Then 3) a Xeon workstation with ECC RAM (and therefore probably linux as the main OS). Question is, should I somehow rearrange my current machines? Make the Haswell SuperMicro into an ESXi server, the Ivy Asus into a workstation and get the Pentium D for the NAS?
Q2: How serious is the Asus P8C WS as a workstation motherboard?
I have heard that some consider it basically a joke. But I got it because there was a good chance to get it working as a hackintosh, although the ECC RAM support never materialized. SuperMicro would have been a bit more expensive and not as easy for a hackintosh.
Q3: If one were to start from scratch, what would / should / could he buy for a basic linux workstation?
By saying basic, I mean either a Xeon E3 (4 cores) or a single socket E5 (4 or 6 cores) or a dual socket E5 (4 + 4 cores). Would start with 32 GB RAM, must be able to expand to 64 GB, whereas 128 GB support is nice but not mandatory. Am I better served by the older models or Xeon W or any of this valuable metal stuff (Bronze / Silver / Gold)? Or something from AMD?
I don't expect anyone to go and hunt for answers for me. But if someone has already found out answers for these, I think many others would be served by them too.
I am a student with low income and some savings. That forces me to juggle these a bit.
Q4: Should everyone always go for Xeon D for NAS or ESXi, or could an E3 Xeon be a total win (i.e. no downsides at all) in some situations?
Q5: What about E5-1620 over E3-1230?
Q6: Any better choice for a single E5 Haswell / Broadwell workstation than X10SRA-F?
Last edited: