That is insane..... Is it the much lower clocks that is the reason?PassMark - AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - Price performance comparison - the result is bit under 46k
Passmark doesn't yet have results for quad E7-8894, but its smaller cousin quad E7-8880 (24 vs 22 cores and 165W vs 150W TPD)
PassMark - [Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v3 @ 2.30GHz - Price performance comparison - 50k
FTFY, and yes.
Integer Math | 488,554 MOps/Sec |
---|
Extended Instructions | 125,986 Million Matrices/Sec |
---|
Integer Math | 628,857 MOps/Sec |
---|
Extended Instructions | 119,620 Million Matrices/Sec |
---|
Integer Math | 586,518 MOps/Sec |
---|
Extended Instructions | 153,512 Million Matrices/Sec |
---|
Integer Math | 265,668 MOps/Sec |
---|
Extended Instructions | 73,828 Million Matrices/Sec |
---|
Integer Math | 192,671 MOps/Sec |
---|
Extended Instructions | 40,343 Million Matrices/Sec |
---|
Integer Math | 138,265 MOps/Sec |
---|
Extended Instructions | 33,849 Million Matrices/Sec |
---|
PassMark - AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - Price performance comparison - the result is bit under 46k
Wow it means 4x 8895 v2 on DDR3 is "faster"Passmark doesn't yet have results for quad E7-8894, but its smaller cousin quad E7-8880 (24 vs 22 cores and 165W vs 150W TPD)
PassMark - [Quad CPU] Intel Xeon E7-8880 v3 @ 2.30GHz - Price performance comparison - 50k
Might be smart. They are almost for free now, like G8 2.5year ago. The only problem is (for me at least) single core drama. 2.5year ago also was no Ryzen5000, 12900k and Epyc zen3.Im looking at one of these v4 servers for a heavily multithreaded workload.
Confirmed 8894v4 can do this, I am fighting with 2.9GHz all core limit (was 3.2GHz in 8895v2 - 15 vs 24 cores but also 22 vs 14nm).This will use as many threads as i can get but no one single thread utilizes 100% of its assigned core currently so im thinking i could get away with a whole bunch of lesser cores like the xeon v4.
Hmmm, good idea - do you know how to do this?Also, what impact does removing security mitigations have, i wonder?
Did you disable mitigations? And is this score the result after you disabled them?Ok now 8894v4 it's faster than 8895v2 @3.6GHz
2115 points on single core @ 2.88GHz, still need 3.4GHz (or more)
AMD EPYC 7773X - 2410 points :/
AMD EPYC 7773X still a bit faster in "Integer Math" much slower in (not needed in my case) SSE/AVX.
Is it something what I can do on the hardware side in the BIOS/UEFI?Did you disable mitigations? And is this score the result after you disabled them?
that's at the OS level - I know how to do it on Linux but not on Windows.Is it something what I can do on the hardware side in the BIOS/UEFI?
So there is a significant improvement in having all of the memory channels populated?Just read pdf about "Jordan Creek 2" chips (mem buffers for E7 v3/v4) - and I made BIG mistake in number of RAM dimms and memory configuration.
The bad idea:
E7 is quad channel
So 4x 4 =16 dimms
NOT TRUE
good one:
E7 is quad channel but using SMI interface.
SMI almost double the single DIMM speed.
Each "Jordan Creek 2" chip is converting two ddr channels (3 dimm each) to single SMI interface.
So: 4 processors x 4 SMI x2 = 32DIMMs optimal.
In short there is still space for improvment I put just 16dimms here
Youre running a DL580 g9. What BIOS version are you on?sorry it is 64x16GB
but yes it does !! it is much faster on DDR3 (64dimms) than on DDR4 (16 dimms)
View attachment 23581