Possible, not guaranteed (giving up performance and longevity at cost)
I have HDD's that are eons old and still work and those are your run of the mill consumer drives.
The RED's are a higher tier NAS drive that are made for long life and reliability (3 year warranty I think?)
Inside somewhere are the same platters, and a lot of the same parts.
The largest difference IMO is the enterprise is SAS and consumer is SATA and the cost/warranty. As a SAN/Backup Admin I have seen them fail on me at the same rates.
Anybody that works in enterprise knows enterprise is overpriced because businesses are expected to spend money in ways consumers are not. I mean paying $1500 for a Cisco or HP SFP module that works exactly the same as a $40 module from a different brand.
We have full blown high end enterprise servers like we use for Veeam loaded up with 10TB enterprise drives, and I have hand built some secondary storage for fun out of old servers with consumer (RED) drives. Both systems under the same load, they are lasting the same.
At home I use a R710 with 6x 8TB RED and have not had a single error or failure in about 2 years, and I am most likely going to load up my R510 with 10x 10TB REDs once I have the spending money.
That many drives running 24/7 at home. Yes the heat/power/noise is important to me and for reliability that is why I use RAID. The cost savings alone means I can refresh the drives to new ones based on the math done by another member. It was what $400 over 5 years and I can buy a new 10TB drive for $180? So I can build a new server in about 2 years just in the cost savings. I think a 2 year old RED has better bets than taking your enterprise drive out to 5 years.
Not everybody is the same when it comes to income, needs, or usage so no one size fits all but I try to sit where one size fits most