I'm just getting the 1700. Does anyone know of a small ATX case with room for 2x 5.25" hotswap and 2 add-in cards?What coolers are recommended for a 1800X? I won't be overclocking it but do want it cool and quiet.
I'm just getting the 1700. Does anyone know of a small ATX case with room for 2x 5.25" hotswap and 2 add-in cards?What coolers are recommended for a 1800X? I won't be overclocking it but do want it cool and quiet.
ooh nice.. about time AMD gave Intel some competition again !I did get hands-on time with Ryzen 7 and have benchmarks (will release on March 2.) This is something I am personally pre-ordering.
@Patrick when you get access to Ryzen 7 and Naples on linux, can you also share output for this command‘znver1’
AMD Family 17h core based CPUs with x86-64 instruction set support. (This supersets BMI, BMI2, F16C, FMA, FSGSBASE, AVX, AVX2, ADCX, RDSEED, MWAITX, SHA, CLZERO, AES, PCL_MUL, CX16, MOVBE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, ABM, XSAVEC, XSAVES, CLFLUSHOPT, POPCNT, and 64-bit instruction set extensions.
gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target
i'd probably see how well the stock coolers do and go from there. You'll likely not be let down by a good noctua thoughWhat coolers are recommended for a 1800X? I won't be overclocking it but do want it cool and quiet.
@Patrick cheers. Just updated Centmin Mod LEMP stack to support both GCC 5.3.1 and GCC 6.2.1 along with native CentOS GCC versions, so hopefully AMD Ryzen 7 only needs GCC 6.2 and not GCC 7 to take full advantage of the cpu@eva2000 AMD will run x86 out of the box. I think the compiler optimizations may not fully be in GCC yet.
I am going to see if I can get one of these up in the DemoEval lab, perhaps using a lantronix KVM, before my India trip.
Ok I'll not press the issue. No stock cooler eh that's dumb considering it's a 500 buck chip.
Makes perfect sense if your target market is OC dorks who would never be caught dead using a stock cooler.No stock cooler eh that's dumb considering it's a 500 buck chip.
Yeah that makes sense. I had written buying zen off as I have too much computing but I'm back on the fence now.Makes perfect sense if your target market is OC dorks who would never be caught dead using a stock cooler.
AMD's story at the time was that it wasn't affecting deliveries, but the vendors couldn't get product. They tried to downplay the significance of the issue, but they didn't ramp up volume deliveries until after they had a handle on the bugs--and that most certainly affected future designs from a number of vendors, and their market share.AMD didn't pretend that Barcelona wasn't a fiasco. They acknowledged there was a TLB issue and that's the main issue (which had a performance hit as a result). It just took longer before they rolled out fixed silicon for it and in the meantime had to use cpu-microcode patches to mitigate it.
Well, everyone is certainly entitled to their opinion, but AMD's been making the stuff for a while and relatively few people seem interested in buying it. The performance of the CPUs has been kinda meh in comparison to intel at the same approximate price point, and if the GPU performance is better, who cares--nobody buys integrated GPU looking for performance. And it's not just the CPU, intel has a better story these days on the complete chipset (wireless, network, etc). You can find AMDs in the wild, but basically on budget systems where price matters more than anything else and for a small number of people who just really don't want to buy anything from intel.I highly disagree with this. They are particularly compelling parts
Yes, it's their HT replacement, and competitor to QPI (and future UPI). And it would be a lot more of a differentiator if they'd shipped it on time; even now they don't really need it because they haven't shipped anything that actually takes advantage of the theoretical improvements (the importance of the big xen + integrated high end GPU is to utilize that on-die link, there have also been discussions of things like on-die FPGA but that's also not here yet). At this point it's not clear they'll ship something before intel delivers UPI along with parts to utilize it (they're more focused on server environments, and integrating high speed networking).What I was discussing was the successor to HT (hyper-transport) which is the "Infinity fabric" which Zen is utilizing and so will Vega as well. It's their current interconnect implementation
I think you're misreading the graph. They were on a pretty steady upward trend until 2006 when the market was waiting for a quad core part. They flubbed it, their share dropped between 5 and 10 points (definitely more than 5) share--which was a decline of almost 50%--by the end of 07. They went up a little bit once they started shipping again but after that it was just a long slow downhill trend. They never recovered the positive momentum they had from 2003-2006.Intel has had various hardware errata over the years so it's not just AMD who has TLB. Infact even Nehalem had TLB (contrary to the claims which say the opposite) and Intel acknowledged it too (which required bios workarounds and patches). Sure AMD's reputation was damaged with the TLB issue but it didn't mean they exited or have their market share drastically affected. That point only really came about with Bulldozer's launch and this verifies that (only a 5% drop in market share attributed to TLB):
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_YzBo7Kz5y...hwkABvdOo7A/s1600/AMD_server_share_Sterne.GIF
Well my 1680v3 gets stomped on by all three models... at least in R15.So when are we going to see the UP workstation (E3/E5-16xx equivalent) version of Ryzen?
Years ago I used to LOVE that about AMD chips - even at the lowest end of the scale with AM3/AM3+ if you got a MB with ECC support enabled the chip was happy to oblige.... Even AM3/AM3+ had such Opterons...
Yeah, I am thinking feature equivalent vs performance. 10G onboard with ECC, maybe some more PCIE. Video, SAS Raid for local spinners, 10G card maxes out a X370 board's PCIE in full ATX.Well my 1680v3 gets stomped on by all three models... at least in R15.