Monero Mining Performance
- Thread starter Patrick
- Start date
Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.
Yes you did. But interestingly the new AMD actually is the top dog. The Intel is a quad and AMD dual CPU result. Way over 6kh/s with a quad AMD....unbelievable.Called it. Original post even said 8180 but was generalized to skylake xenon
Yes I saw it too... but you need PSU for motherboard and this PSU for GPUs. It's pointles if it doesn't have molex/sata/PCI-E enter to turn it of. It's called AD2PSU adapter
Good afternoon all. I don't have much experience with mining, or with Intel chips as a general rule (please don't hate me. lol) - But what would the hash rate be on a pair of E5645 Processors?
I see people talking about per node, is that what you are connected to, and trying to mine from (I am ridiculously new to this, and trying to understand it all).
I have tried searching for a comprehensive list of processors and mining speeds, but I didn't seem to find the processor I was looking for with relevant XMR hash rates.
Reading through this article, though, you guys have some powerful beasts.
Many Regards,
Brian
We are mining on some L5640s which get about 250H/s on a dual socket board. The issue is that if you look at Patrick's list on the front page of the forum you will find that some Atom procs will run at least 70H/s. You would be better off running a few compute sticks and saving massive energy than running L5640s. We are only running them because we are mining with GPUs in the same box.
Some benchmarks:
IBM x3850 X5 4*E7-4830
OS - ESXi 5.5
xmr-stak-cpu on Win7 VM with 32 vCPU, running with 32 threads
Hashrate - ~1000H/s
IBM x3850 X5 4*E7-4830
OS - ESXi 5.5
xmr-stak-cpu on Win7 VM with 32 vCPU, running with 32 threads
Hashrate - ~1000H/s
AMD Vega Frontier Edition = 901 H/s
[Usertest] AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition - Bilder, Benchmarks, Energiemessungen
[Usertest] AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition - Bilder, Benchmarks, Energiemessungen
Quanta Windmill (1 node with 2 CPU)
2*Xeon E5-2650v1
780H/s (highest 787 H/s)
20 threads with proper CPU affinity (each CPU 8 threads for the physical cores and 2 threads for the virtual ones)
Power draw - 190W from the wall
2*Xeon E5-2650v1
780H/s (highest 787 H/s)
20 threads with proper CPU affinity (each CPU 8 threads for the physical cores and 2 threads for the virtual ones)
Power draw - 190W from the wall
Xeon Silver 4108 (8 cores / 16 threads), L2 + L3 cache 21MB
H/s by number of threads used:
7 = 280H/s
8 = 305H/s
9 = 288H/s
10 = 275H/s
11 = 265H/s
Interestingly enough, the Skylake-SP chips seem to be less good than Broadwell-EP at this. My hypothesis (to be tested) is that XMR is too big to fit into L2 so it generates a ton of L3 cache requests.
Also, it is strange that the 4114 is doing better with L2+L3/ 2MB while the 4108 is doing better at $numcores
H/s by number of threads used:
7 = 280H/s
8 = 305H/s
9 = 288H/s
10 = 275H/s
11 = 265H/s
Interestingly enough, the Skylake-SP chips seem to be less good than Broadwell-EP at this. My hypothesis (to be tested) is that XMR is too big to fit into L2 so it generates a ton of L3 cache requests.
Also, it is strange that the 4114 is doing better with L2+L3/ 2MB while the 4108 is doing better at $numcores
Last edited:
Yes I was surprised of those results. Considering that these are recent tech. I have some 6-year-old 15 USD AMD CPUs that beat those numbers easily. Even the 4332HE with a 65W TDP gets pretty close at 260 H/s.
Mostly cache size and frequency driven with little on IPC. It makes sense from that perspective but still lower than I would want to see.
im using xmr-stak-cpu(v1.3.0-1.5.0) on ubuntu server 16.4.2 on a 2p opteron 6276 system. anyone know how the threads should be done in the config? i tried the default that it suggests but it looks like only 2 of the threads were mining(at like 50h/s each for a little over a 100h/s total). there is obv something wrong so any help is appreciated.
Hi,
i need some clarify please,
what do you mean by "2x Intel Xeon E5-2670 V1 = 829H/s" ..
1- do you mean CPU = 829H/s per every core or per every processor .. ?!
2- Also, do you mean by "2x" dual like dual core or two/twice .. ?!
3- Also, what is the HashRate of "Intel Xeon X5650" .. ?!
Best Regards,
Memooo ..
i need some clarify please,
what do you mean by "2x Intel Xeon E5-2670 V1 = 829H/s" ..
1- do you mean CPU = 829H/s per every core or per every processor .. ?!
2- Also, do you mean by "2x" dual like dual core or two/twice .. ?!
3- Also, what is the HashRate of "Intel Xeon X5650" .. ?!
Best Regards,
Memooo ..
Thank u for reply my question!
1. Yes every processor
2. Two processor.
3. Which HashRate of gives Intel Xeon x5650 XMR MONERO
1. Yes every processor
2. Two processor.
3. Which HashRate of gives Intel Xeon x5650 XMR MONERO