I'm not at home to check the firmware version on mine.just got my S600WP-5GT-2SX_SE with FW 1.0.0 as my christmas present ....which firmware you are running? is there a solution to the 10G SFP+ already? I was planning to use copper 10G modules.
Indeed, no issues - firmware:I'm not at home to check the firmware version on mine.
Solution to what? It only has a problem with longer DAC cables. Anything other transceiver that does active signaling should work fine. Note that copper 10GBase-T modules can get pretty hot due to their higher power draw, so keep that in mind. My fiber module that draws a fraction of the power already gets pretty hot to the touch on the switch side.
Don't expect passive DAC cables longer than 1 meter to work with this switch. An AOC or active DAC cable should probably work though.Hasivo Port 5 i actually planned to use also 10G SFP+ RJ45 but can use AOC cable (active optical cable, similar to DAC) or DAC cables here, with a length between 1m and 2m, so basically short length.
basically, i only need a basic part of the functions, but it must run stable
Is it based on the same platform as the model with 2 SFP+ ports? If so, I guess they might've decided on a single 10GBase-T port due to thermal constraints.I got myself the S600WP-4GT-2XGT-SE for Christmas (the model with 10G RJ45 instead of SFP+).
I had to open it up today (it has a DUMB/WEB switch which is very difficult to move when it's in the DUMB position, and I want to setup some VLANs).
In Rohit's review of the S600-5GT the chipset heatsink is partially covered by the PoE daughterboard. I'm surprised that in my model this is mostly obstructed. I guess this is OK - nothing's overheated so far. At least there are (thick) pads under all the heatsinked components.
ETA: It's a shame that only the 2.5G ports have PoE. It's expensive to buy multigig injectors & at least one 10G PoE port would have been fantastic.
It's 4x2.5Gb + 2x10Gb. They've just weirdly spaced the 10Gb ports.Is it based on the same platform as the model with 2 SFP+ ports? If so, I guess they might've decided on a single 10GBase-T port due to thermal constraints.
It's AliExpress, but I've found the switch selection from New Zealand is much better than USA and Europe.Where did you order it from btw? I only find references to it on Taobao.
Oh, I see. It may be using a different hardware platform then, possible the newer Realtek platform also used by the cheap unmanaged switches from YuanLey, Davuaz, HiSource, etc. but in this case with management and PoE added on top.It's 4x2.5Gb + 2x10Gb. They've just weirdly spaced the 10Gb ports.
It's AliExpress, but I've found the switch selection from New Zealand is much better than USA and Europe.
I got the 4+2 PoE for US$112 at Christmas, and it's currently US$122 after discounts.
Interesting.The firmware seems functionally & visually identical, which is why I commented here. I got 1.7 firmware.
I was on this thread looking for pictures of the innards so I could see how similar the hardware was.
View attachment 33406
Yes, port 1 is special in some way and that's probably why it's a bit buggy sometimes in terms of PoE. The rest have been solid for me.I picked up a couple of these to drive a pair of unifi u6+. Seem to be working fine. At first, port 1 POE was a bit flakey (delivered power to u6+, but no network). Disconnected/reconnected a few times and it seemed to work. Based on advice above, switched to port2.
It seems like port1 is "special"? Supports "BT" and "HiPoE"? ports 2-4 are just AT/AF? Could be the cause of the initial issues.
Also: any clue what "PoEDog" enable does? My googling has come up blank...
Product listing said:Have PoEdog function that when PoE is on, the switch can achieve real-time detection on powered devices. And the switch automatically sets the ports and then restores PoE power supplying to make no duty come true.
Ah, that makes sense. I just enabled it, as sometimes (even with port2) my unifi u6+ would get power but no network connection (flashing blue on the u6, no lights on the port). Seemed like a potential race condition between powering up and negotiating connection.Yes, port 1 is special in some way and that's probably why it's a bit buggy sometimes in terms of PoE. The rest have been solid for me.
I'm not sure what PoEDog is, but my guess is that it might be a PoE watchdog feature that will automatically power cycle the device connected to that port if it stops responding to pings or something like that. I haven't tested it to confirm if that is indeed what it does, but it's the kind of feature I've seen on other PoE switches/routers.
EDIT: Yes, it seems my guess was accurate, based on this quote from the product listing linked below:
8 Port Ethernet PoE Switch, 10 Port (8+2) - 8 PoE Port + 2 Gibabit Metal kasa Switch ENTEGRON TS6208PENTG2G
8 Port Ethernet PoE Switch, 10 Port (8+2) - 8 PoE Port + 2 Gibabit Metal kasa Switch ENTEGRON TS6208PENTG2G 8 port 10/100M Poe Switch With 2 Gigabit RJ45 Uplink Ports Product Description: · 8*10/100mbps POE port;2*10/100mbps UP Link pwww.longlinestore.com
I haven't been having any issues with connection negotiation for my Unifi AC-LR AP so far, but I haven't rebooted the switch more than a handful of times so far.Ah, that makes sense. I just enabled it, as sometimes (even with port2) my unifi u6+ would get power but no network connection (flashing blue on the u6, no lights on the port). Seemed like a potential race condition between powering up and negotiating connection.
I haven't played with it much, but I'm hoping a poe watchdog timer might help and won't hurt.
There are no configuration options I could see to set the "up" detection or timeout, but if it power cycles after a while if there is no negotiated connection it should help what I was seeing. Everything is up and working now, but I had to replug the cable several times to get it to connect.
This information might turn out to actually be useful in some cases, not just a curiosity. Based on a customer review of one of their other switches seemingly using the same management UI (e.g. S600WP-4GT-1SX-1XGT-SE) suggests at least some of Hasivo switch models all ship with the same hardcoded MAC address, which can obviously be problematic if you try to connect more than one of them to the same network.Digging around a bit in the firmware, I noticed that it contains some hidden menus:
/oem_set.html - Upload a new logo for the UI.
/system_set.html - Modify the default system details, specifically:
Company Name
Company Link
Copyright Year
Device Mac
Factory Sys Name
Factory IP Addr
Factory Netmask
Factory Gateway
I have not tried if they actually do anything. Note that you need to be logged in before accessing those pages.
This is in Realtek/Switch Version 3.2.0 -- Sat Apr 22 20:00:14 CST 2023