Thank you for your response. I realize the implication if the DHCP server is unavailable but I presently cannot access the management interface on a static IP through the existing wireguard VPN tunnel.
POE model's have a P at the end of their model name so for a POE ICX 6610-48 it would be ICX 6610-48 for non POE, and ICX 6610-48P for the POE model
Not sure about compatibility, but are you sure you want to connect to a device up to 10km away from your switch?
LR has no minimum distance though, so it should be fine in that regard. Yeah, SR LC UPC Duplex does make more sense but I needed white cables and happened to have some white simplex fiber lying around from a previous installation, so decided to buy the BiDi transceivers. I couldn't really find reputable sources for white single-mode fiber, but I didn't spend too much time looking since I had this fiber already and so assumed it would work.
I'm using only single mode fibre. In fact, my in-wall installation is 2*cat6a cables +4*single mode fiber.LR has no minimum distance though, so it should be fine in that regard. Yeah, SR LC UPC Duplex does make more sense but I needed white cables and happened to have some white simplex fiber lying around from a previous installation, so decided to buy the BiDi transceivers. I couldn't really find reputable sources for white single-mode fiber, but I didn't spend too much time looking since I had this fiber already and so assumed it would work.
Hoping I'm just missing something in the configs though - does FS.com do returns?
Supposedly, the transceiver EEPROM can be reprogrammed to report as a duplex transceiver and the switch would detect it. My only board with an SFP+ connection is a BPi-R4 running OpenWRT and it doesn't look like the MTK driver supports dumping or modifying the EEPROM or registers:LR has no minimum distance though, so it should be fine in that regard. Yeah, SR LC UPC Duplex does make more sense but I needed white cables and happened to have some white simplex fiber lying around from a previous installation, so decided to buy the BiDi transceivers. I couldn't really find reputable sources for white single-mode fiber, but I didn't spend too much time looking since I had this fiber already and so assumed it would work.
Hoping I'm just missing something in the configs though - does FS.com do returns?
root@OpenWrt:~# ethtool -e eth1
Cannot get EEPROM data: Not supported
root@OpenWrt:~# ethtool -i eth1
driver: mtk_soc_eth
version: 6.6.63
firmware-version:
expansion-rom-version:
bus-info: 15100000.ethernet
supports-statistics: yes
supports-test: no
supports-eeprom-access: no
supports-register-dump: no
supports-priv-flags: noethtool on desktop x86 Linux,show media. I dont have the MPO cables to connect to them to test whether they can show active though.show podUnit-Id: 1
PoD 10G license capacity: 24
PoD 10G license capacity used: 24
PoD 40G license capacity: 24
PoD 40G license capacity used: 6
PoD-ports Lic-Available Lic-Used
1/2/1 Yes Yes
1/2/2 Yes Yes
1/2/3 Yes Yes
1/2/4 Yes Yes
1/3/1 Yes Yes
1/3/2 Yes Yes
1/3/3 Yes Yes
1/3/4 Yes Yes
1/3/5 Yes Yes
1/3/6 Yes Yes
1/3/7 Yes Yes
1/3/8 Yes Yesshow mediaPort 1/2/1: Type : EMPTY
Port 1/2/2: Type : EMPTY
Port 1/2/3: Type : EMPTY
Port 1/2/4: Type : EMPTYshow media validationPort Supported Vendor Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1/2/1 Yes CISCO-PROLINE 40G QSFP Module
1/2/2 Yes CISCO-PROLINE 40G QSFP Module
1/2/3 Yes CISCO-PROLINE 40G QSFP Module
1/2/4 Yes CISCO-PROLINE 40G QSFP Moduleshow media ethernet 1/2/XPort 1/2/1: Type : 40G QSFP Module
Vendor Name: CISCO-PROLINE Serial Num: PROXXXXXXXXX Revision: D1
Port 1/2/2: Type : 40G QSFP Module
Vendor Name: CISCO-PROLINE Serial Num: PROXXXXXXXXX Revision: D1
Port 1/2/3: Type : 40G QSFP Module
Vendor Name: CISCO-PROLINE Serial Num: PROXXXXXXXXX Revision: D1
Port 1/2/4: Type : 40G QSFP Module
Vendor Name: CISCO-PROLINE Serial Num: PROXXXXXXXXX Revision: D1Port 1/2/3: Type : EMPTY
Port Supported Vendor Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1/2/3 Yes CISCO-AVAGO 40G QSFP Module
Port 1/2/3: Type : 40G QSFP Module
Vendor Name: CISCO-AVAGO Serial Num: AVMXXXXXXXX Revision: 01Port 1/2/1: Type : 40GBASE-Passive Copper
Port 1/2/2: Type : 40GBASE-Passive Copper
Port Supported Vendor Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1/2/1 Yes Mellanox 40G QSFP Module
1/2/2 Yes Mellanox 40G QSFP Module
Port 1/2/1: Type : 40G QSFP Module
Vendor Name: Mellanox Serial Num: 6CFXXXXXXX Revision: A1
Port 1/2/2: Type : 40G QSFP Module
Vendor Name: Mellanox Serial Num: 6CFXXXXXXX Revision: A1| firewall/router | 2.5 G copper link | ICX 7150 | 10G fiber link | icx 7250 |
| 172.17.1.1 | GW: 172.17.1.1 | GW 172.17.1.1 | ||
| 172.17.10.1 | 172.17.1.2 | 172.17.1.3 | ||
| 172.17.20.1 | 172.17.20.2 | 172.17.20.3 |
I am pretty sure that all the 7XXX series have gone to the honor based licensing. Although I do not own the 7150-48ZP, I own several 7150-24P units that were advertised with different numbers of SFP+ ports. The only difference was the installed license, and I was able to simply enable the additional ports.
That's my understanding but given the price tag and the main reason to upgrade is the additional SFP+ I hope someone can definitively confirm. The 2.5 Gbps ports are a nice plus.