after reading through all of "that" - I find myself using the ignore member function for the first time.

XDDDDD LAWL ROFLCOPTER don't worry I'll let you get back to your beloved men's support forum.after reading through all of "that" - I find myself using the ignore member function for the first time.![]()
![]()
the spare you grabbed and tested, was it a spare AP, or a space ICX? if you had the problem even on a separate newly booted ICX, that def sounds like the unifi device was having issues. if it was a spare AP, and the same icx with the prob was still having the issue on the different AP, then yeah it sounds like a strange icx bug. what OS and PoE fw version are you on?Just had my first real weirdness with my 6610. I had a unifi access point go offline. Weird. I power cycled the POE port on my 6610, and while the port has 2 lights on, the cli says the port is down. I try the port next to it (19)...same issue. I grab a new spare out of the box, same issue. I test the RJ45 cable with a tester (all pairs good). I replace the cable anyway, same issue.
I reload the POE stack member these are attached into and everything is perfect again. ARGHH
Sorry for the confusion. I tried spare ap, cable & port in the same stack member. I have a 2 stack setup using the 40G QSFP connectors on back. I don't have another ICX6610 that has POE, so as a last resort I kicked just the POE stackmember which has my access points (only) in it.the spare you grabbed and tested, was it a spare AP, or a space ICX? if you had the problem even on a separate newly booted ICX, that def sounds like the unifi device was having issues. if it was a spare AP, and the same icx with the prob was still having the issue on the different AP, then yeah it sounds like a strange icx bug. what OS and PoE fw version are you on?
Another user is saying the fiber I have & transceivers won't work with the card...but I was convinced otherwise:
yes they're regular 40gbe ports. instead of expensive annoying mtp you can grab these BiDi optics and run 40gbE over cheap regular singlemode duplex LC fiber XQX2502 KAIAM QSFP+40G-LR4 Lite OPTICAL MODULE NEW PULLS | eBay
01:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Mellanox Technologies MT27710 Family [ConnectX-4 Lx] [15b3:1015]
Kernel driver in use: mlx5_core
Kernel modules: mlx5_core
show media ethernet 1/3/1
Port 1/3/1: Type : 40GE-LR4 2km (QSFP+ LC)
Vendor: KAIAM CORP Version: 1A
Part# : XQX2502 Serial#: KD60315209
Settings for enp1s0np0:
Speed: Unknown!
Duplex: Unknown! (255)
Auto-negotiation: on
Port: FIBRE
PHYAD: 0
Transceiver: internal
Supports Wake-on: d
Wake-on: d
Current message level: 0x00000004 (4)
link
Link detected: no
show media ethernet 1/4/1
Port 1/4/1: Type : 40GBASE-Passive Copper 2m (QSFP+)
Vendor: Mellanox Version: A3
Part# : MC2207130-002 Serial#: MT1433VS02614
Settings for enp1s0np0:
Speed: 40000Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Auto-negotiation: on
Port: Direct Attach Copper
PHYAD: 0
Transceiver: internal
Supports Wake-on: d
Wake-on: d
Current message level: 0x00000004 (4)
link
Link detected: yes
02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Mellanox Technologies MT27500 Family [ConnectX-3] [15b3:1003]
Kernel driver in use: mlx4_core
Kernel modules: mlx4_core
show media ethernet 1/3/1
Port 1/3/1: Type : 40GE-LR4 2km (QSFP+ LC)
Vendor: KAIAM CORP Version: 1A
Part# : XQX2502 Serial#: KD60315209
Settings for enp2s0:
Speed: 40000Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Auto-negotiation: off
Port: FIBRE
PHYAD: 0
Transceiver: internal
Supports Wake-on: d
Wake-on: d
Current message level: 0x00000014 (20)
link ifdown
Link detected: yes
I haven't noticed that. In fact two hours ago:but as you've noticed, you're the only one in this thread having these issues. You could have bad fiber, you could have newer or older firmware, your motherboard might not like supplying extra power to the NIC, who knows.
I have also had a fair amount of issues with SX6036 + LR4 Transceivers in the last couple of days (result: only Mellanox branded / programmed LR4 optics seem to be accepted by the SX6036)
...
I have tried Finisar FTL4C1QL2L LR4-Lite and FS.com modules and both only worked after I patched the vendor to "Mellanox"
Even worse ConnectX-5 and Infiniband, because the CX-5 seems to do a deeper inspection and still detects the modules as "FS" whereas the switch happily reports "Mellanox"
He's wrong like most people on the internet
So you're infallible? To me everyone here is just text on a screen. It's all equal in my eyes until I see something functional.
same here...after reading through all of "that" - I find myself using the ignore member function for the first time.![]()
![]()
yeah I think that last one might be the cringiest thing I've seen on here in years lmaosame here...
Could not agree more.... best part is, its showing on google results. I only just recently got here and this is what I found in relation to Brocade + Mellonoxyeah I think that last one might be the cringiest thing I've seen on here in years lmao
lol you guys should untuck your shirts every once in a while.yeah I think that last one might be the cringiest thing I've seen on here in years lmao
This is the top SEO because there were no resources on this before me. The algorithm doesn't lie.Could not agree more.... best part is, its showing on google results. I only just recently got here and this is what I found in relation to Brocade + Mellonox
That guy is crinnnnnnngggggeeee
@fohdeesha The Infallible, confirmed fallible - ConnectX-4 Lx DO NOT work with KAIAM modules:
My last artwork was removed for "crimes against vision" so I had to bring my A gameYou got a nice new avatar for it!
Thank you for your answer!There are no stupid questions, only stupid answers
The answer is no: stacking can only be done using devices in the same family (64xx, 65xx, 66xx, 71xx, 72xx, etc.)
How does one aquire a license to upgrade the ports ??forgot to mention: licenses for these models are free for existing STH members - now that they are EOL & discontinued I don't really have an alternative to giving them away![]()
It's literally at the top of the first post.How does one aquire a license to upgrade the ports ??