I don't know ... but I also assume you'd want to verify for yourself anyway ... so would you like me to send you the SN for them..? My guess is at least the EVO 870 are likely to since I believe they had a 5y warranty and haven't even been out for 5y ... the PM983 are HPE oem, so those I'd assume do not have any ... but I was the original owner of those and wrote 10-15TB ... and read ≤22TB ... and as drives with a 1.3 DWPD endurance have more than 99% of their life remaining. The Evo 860 are unlikely to have any, but I can provide those to you also if you'd like them..?Any warranty left on them?
Thank you for the detailed reply. I was more curious than anything as a factory warranty increases their value to a buyer. I bought an 8TB QVO drive a couple of years back so no need for any ssds atm. Of course I say this and that's when something will happen and I will need one stat, lol.I don't know ... but I also assume you'd want to verify for yourself anyway ... so would you like me to send you the SN for them..? My guess is at least the EVO 870 are likely to since I believe they had a 5y warranty and haven't even been out for 5y ... the PM983 are HPE oem, so those I'd assume do not have any ... but I was the original owner of those and wrote 10-15TB ... and read ≤22TB ... and as drives with a 1.3 DWPD endurance have more than 99% of their life remaining. The Evo 860 are unlikely to have any, but I can provide those to you also if you'd like them..?
Would you like the Evo 870 SNs..?
Sure. It can't hurt. Send away ...
Isn't that drive only rated for 2.4PB?FYI, I bought 2x 860 Evo 4TB drives from this seller and one of them has 2.2 PB written
While I might consider that omission intentionally misleading especially noting low writes on the other drives, did you ask?FYI, I bought 2x 860 Evo 4TB drives from this seller and one of them has 2.2 PB written
No I didn’t ask up front and obviously I should have. I think at the time I may have conflated the usage numbers from the SAS drives with these.While I might consider that omission intentionally misleading especially noting low writes on the other drives, did you ask?