ebay QS from $600...
if not work(loading forever) clear browser cache & cookies or try different browser.
Last edited:
Xeon W-3200 processor in C622 motherboard?
- Thread starter blinkenlights
- Start date
Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.
if not work(loading forever) clear browser cache & cookies or try different browser.
QS can be retail too. "production unit" will be the correct word.QS since that seems quit cheap for Retail
Not retail (I think the W-3245/-3265/-3275 were Apple parts), but QS or not specified. eBay listings start at $598 OBO.
The W-3200 series is not officially supported with the C622 chipset, that's an Intel thing. I imagine it will work, I am hoping it will work, but if it lets out the magic smoke of my X11SPi-TF, Supermicro will say I am out of luck.
intel benchmarks
VS.
Intel® Xeon® W-3245, PL1=205W, 16/32, Turbo up to 4.4GHz, Motherboard: EVGA SR-3 DARK 10G, Motherboard Type: Production, BIOS: 1.04, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro P2000, GFX Driver Version: 462.96, Memory: 192GB (6x32GB, 2933 MHz) DDR4 ECC RDIMM, Storage: 960GB Intel(R) Optane(TM) 905P, OS: Linux, OS Version: Ubuntu, OS Build: 20.04.2 LTS4U
Xeon W-3245 on a EVGA SR-3 Dark(C622) in Intel database
risky to use the C622 because Xeon W-3200 is not supported.
VS.
Intel® Xeon® W-3245, PL1=205W, 16/32, Turbo up to 4.4GHz, Motherboard: EVGA SR-3 DARK 10G, Motherboard Type: Production, BIOS: 1.04, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro P2000, GFX Driver Version: 462.96, Memory: 192GB (6x32GB, 2933 MHz) DDR4 ECC RDIMM, Storage: 960GB Intel(R) Optane(TM) 905P, OS: Linux, OS Version: Ubuntu, OS Build: 20.04.2 LTS4U
Xeon W-3245 on a EVGA SR-3 Dark(C622) in Intel database
risky to use the C622 because Xeon W-3200 is not supported.
yes the VRMs of the X11SPi are weak. probably the W-3245 kill them.
Last edited:
No, the other way around and I was being facetious...
Anyhow, thanks for the discussion guys. Have a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!
I just installed a W-3265M on it, the X11SPA-TF have 205W TDP support, the CPU is rated at 205W, isn't that enough?
I exaggerated a bit (X11SPi)
the X11SPA uses a better VRM unit.
i mean if you use a Xeon W - then mostly in a Workstation case with not so ideal cooling of the VRM power stages.
Ok thanks, this reassures me a little
...and yes, I meant the X11SPI, not SPA, that was a typo.I think I will eventually take one of these anyway, if I can find one... which also have 255TDP support and a better heatsink for both the VRM and the 10G chip (which gets very hot as I see in the X11SPI).