I am evaluating options for upgrading to a 200GbE (from 100GbE) some small parts of the network environment and I am interested in understanding the realistic speeds achievable with different combinations of connectors and cables (never seen OSFP connector yet).
Probably QSFP56 is a good connector, or OSFP is better?
Now old used 200GbE QSFP56 Mellanox cards are similar price like 4 years ago Mellanox 100GbE QSFP28 (OSFP 200GbE and 400GbE are more expensive).
And now Switch - I found:
and they have two 200GbE ports (enough for one NAS and one "C++ Builder"), but not QSFP56 but QSFP-DD 200GbE, any chance to connect it at 200GbE with Mellanox ConnectX-6 200GbE QSFP56?
I am guessing at 200GbE it might be tricky because QSFP56 is 4 lanes, QSFP-DD 200GbE is 8 lanes, so 100GbE easy 200GbE not possible or possible?
I am guessing that for example "Mellanox SN3700-VS2FO" will work perfectly 32 x 200GbE QSFP56 Ports, but $9000 for used one is still expensive (especially when max number of connected computers that ever need 200GbE is maybe 7 , right now maybe 3 make any sense).
Currently using Mellanox ConnectX-4 100GbE cards and 2x Celestica DX010, also ConnectX-3 40GbE connected to same Celestica @ 40GbE and few of them connected to Mellanox SX6036G switch then working in 56GbE mode instead of 40GbE.
What do you think - any ideas?
is QSFP56 better standard?
or OSFP 200 is better ?
or... even OSFP 400GbE - and than easy to connect QSFP56 cards @ 200GbE, easy to connect other cheap switches QSFP-DD @ 200GbE too and 400GbE for future?
Cards: OSFP or QSFP56, Transceivers (LC-LC) QSFP56 or OSFP ? or wait 3 years for 400
Best, Michal
Probably QSFP56 is a good connector, or OSFP is better?
Now old used 200GbE QSFP56 Mellanox cards are similar price like 4 years ago Mellanox 100GbE QSFP28 (OSFP 200GbE and 400GbE are more expensive).
And now Switch - I found:
and they have two 200GbE ports (enough for one NAS and one "C++ Builder"), but not QSFP56 but QSFP-DD 200GbE, any chance to connect it at 200GbE with Mellanox ConnectX-6 200GbE QSFP56?
I am guessing at 200GbE it might be tricky because QSFP56 is 4 lanes, QSFP-DD 200GbE is 8 lanes, so 100GbE easy 200GbE not possible or possible?
I am guessing that for example "Mellanox SN3700-VS2FO" will work perfectly 32 x 200GbE QSFP56 Ports, but $9000 for used one is still expensive (especially when max number of connected computers that ever need 200GbE is maybe 7 , right now maybe 3 make any sense).
Currently using Mellanox ConnectX-4 100GbE cards and 2x Celestica DX010, also ConnectX-3 40GbE connected to same Celestica @ 40GbE and few of them connected to Mellanox SX6036G switch then working in 56GbE mode instead of 40GbE.
What do you think - any ideas?
is QSFP56 better standard?
or OSFP 200 is better ?
or... even OSFP 400GbE - and than easy to connect QSFP56 cards @ 200GbE, easy to connect other cheap switches QSFP-DD @ 200GbE too and 400GbE for future?
Cards: OSFP or QSFP56, Transceivers (LC-LC) QSFP56 or OSFP ? or wait 3 years for 400
Best, Michal
Last edited: