Hi all.
Just a doubt I would share:
I tested two X10DRi with 2x e5-2698 v4. (I'm building the second with E5-2698 v3)
I stressed them with intel burn test and CPU-Z (both stress test / bench). Monitoring with CPUID HWMonitor.
With intel burn test less then half of processors ran (both cpu), with CPU-Z sometimes all ran bat not at the full load, in continuos noisy load for two/three test cycle, after that the ran in full load. I was really scared, so I tested them with 3DS for rendering and everything goes perfectly everytime at the first time. Just what I want.
Obviously I don't care about the test and bench, but why they do it? In both twins motherboards! It's my fault? It means something wrong now or in the future? (every other thing works fine, very low operation temperature (min 24°C max 60°C in 'hours' full load), no errors, blue screen, freeze... Nothing, never once.
Maybe something similar happened to someone. Thanks!
S.
Just a doubt I would share:
I tested two X10DRi with 2x e5-2698 v4. (I'm building the second with E5-2698 v3)
I stressed them with intel burn test and CPU-Z (both stress test / bench). Monitoring with CPUID HWMonitor.
With intel burn test less then half of processors ran (both cpu), with CPU-Z sometimes all ran bat not at the full load, in continuos noisy load for two/three test cycle, after that the ran in full load. I was really scared, so I tested them with 3DS for rendering and everything goes perfectly everytime at the first time. Just what I want.
Obviously I don't care about the test and bench, but why they do it? In both twins motherboards! It's my fault? It means something wrong now or in the future? (every other thing works fine, very low operation temperature (min 24°C max 60°C in 'hours' full load), no errors, blue screen, freeze... Nothing, never once.
Maybe something similar happened to someone. Thanks!
S.