Hello,
im my home environment first I was running a ZFS NAS (napp-it) on bare metal. Later I extended it to run the ZFS NAS on ESXi with pass-through of the ZFS drives. This gave me the possibility also to run some small VMs on the same hardware. Now I upgraded the hardware what gave me the possibility to explore the trial Version of Windows Server 2012 R2 Essential running as VM together with the ZVS NAS. Having napp-it integrated in the Active Directory gives a quite comfortable system.
But the Server Folders of WSE 2012 R2 are limited to local discs only. At least I could not figure out how to map a ZFS share to be used by Server Folders. The only way seems to be to use iSCSI. Is this right?
Now I am asking myself if the virtualized ZFS NAS with RAID-Z still makes sense or if I should use directly the disks as Windows "Storage Spaces" instead?
My original intention was to use the WSE connection to the NAS for server, client and VM backups. All SMB Shares I wanted access directly on the ZFS NAS.
Tubs
im my home environment first I was running a ZFS NAS (napp-it) on bare metal. Later I extended it to run the ZFS NAS on ESXi with pass-through of the ZFS drives. This gave me the possibility also to run some small VMs on the same hardware. Now I upgraded the hardware what gave me the possibility to explore the trial Version of Windows Server 2012 R2 Essential running as VM together with the ZVS NAS. Having napp-it integrated in the Active Directory gives a quite comfortable system.
But the Server Folders of WSE 2012 R2 are limited to local discs only. At least I could not figure out how to map a ZFS share to be used by Server Folders. The only way seems to be to use iSCSI. Is this right?
Now I am asking myself if the virtualized ZFS NAS with RAID-Z still makes sense or if I should use directly the disks as Windows "Storage Spaces" instead?
My original intention was to use the WSE connection to the NAS for server, client and VM backups. All SMB Shares I wanted access directly on the ZFS NAS.
Tubs