any opinions and experiences with SuperServer E200-9A or E200-9B

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

nthu9280

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2016
1,629
501
113
San Antonio, TX
Sorry for the confusion. I went back and looked at the above T610 metrics. Test-crypto time is 50sec meaning 65 Mbps. I don't know how / where I got 300mpbs. During the config time over a year ago I tested iperf3 and even T610 cpu didn't break a sweat for 1 gbps non vpn traffic.

Though CPU TDP is higher actual power consumption is better than T610 with identical NIC. My during my above openvpn tests, CPU utilizaton graph on both 610 and 620 web interface was < 40%. I was curious why they couldn't push more vpn throughput since that much free cpu headroom left.
 

nthu9280

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2016
1,629
501
113
San Antonio, TX
@aero That could some what explain the capping out but I was expecting to hit 50% on the pfSense dashboard

Also, went back and looked at my previous post on this thread with T610 metrics.

I think I got the estimate ~300 mbps based on "openssl speed" for aes-128 cbc - 33.3MB/s


Code:
$: openssl speed md5 sha1 sha256 sha512 des des-ede3 aes-128-cbc aes-192-cbc aes-256-cbc rsa2048 dsa2048 | tee /tmp/sslspeed

OpenSSL 1.0.1s-freebsd  1 Mar 2016
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(8x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
compiler: clang
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes
aes-128 cbc      33323.80k    35637.64k    36469.93k    92639.51k    94585.39k
aes-192 cbc      28163.42k    29828.61k    30389.93k    78541.26k    80061.22k
aes-256 cbc      24378.69k    25606.14k    26049.96k    68326.06k    69393.16k
 

BLinux

cat lover server enthusiast
Jul 7, 2016
2,674
1,083
113
artofserver.com