AMD EPYC Embedded 3000 series motherboards?

Discussion in 'Processors and Motherboards' started by McKajVah, Apr 19, 2018.

  1. McKajVah

    McKajVah Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    4
    Anyone actually seen and real life products with these processors??
     
    #1
  2. Evan

    Evan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2016
    Messages:
    2,426
    Likes Received:
    344
    Nope, I haven’t seen any announced let alone available.
     
    #2
  3. zir_blazer

    zir_blazer Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2016
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    47
    I could drop a rant about how much I hate that everytime that AMD has a potentially extremely good product, there is no platform that actually uses it the way that I want. Sometimes there is no platform that uses it at all, or the product is nowhere to be found. I ranted soo much here about that, that I'm already tired of ranting.
     
    #3
  4. Evan

    Evan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2016
    Messages:
    2,426
    Likes Received:
    344
    Embedded products do tend to take longer, and it’s not a mainstream offering as such.
     
    #4
  5. Patrick

    Patrick Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,313
    Likes Received:
    4,263
    I told the SM embedded team at RSA this week: EPYC 3000 with the onboard NICs would be really interesting as a product.

    AMD told me I should start seeing boards within 45 days (not from SM)
     
    #5
    Patriot, Vividal and K D like this.
  6. themelon

    themelon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    6
    I'd like to know when us mere mortals can get our hands on some.
     
    #6
  7. mstone

    mstone Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2015
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    114
    It's not like intel embedded parts have good availability and selection as retail components.
     
    #7
  8. zir_blazer

    zir_blazer Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2016
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    47
    I'm not specifically ranting about the embedded parts. Mobile Raven Ridge looked like a killer CPU for Notebooks, but it took more than half a year since AMD officially launched it before a decent variety of models became available. The only market segment where Processors and Motherboards go hand to hand is Desktop.

    Chances are that even if the embedded parts were more widely available, no Motherboard would arrange the PCIe Lanes and offer the features the way I would want them, and instead you would see me ranting about that, heh.
     
    #8
  9. mbello

    mbello New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2016
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    7
    Does anyone know already how price of Epyc 3000 compares to Xeon D 2100?
    And it puzzles me that SM still seems to have no plan for Epyc 3000... they must be afraid of getting Intel upset.

    I agree that AMD has a big channel problem, me I would love to buy mini PCs based on Ryzen Mobile to replace our workstations. For most office workers, a PC needs nothing more than a modern 15W CPU with iGPU, 2 SO-DIMM slots, an m2 slot and some USB/Eth/DP/HDMI ports. Shouldn't AMD begin taking matters on their own hands by now? Why can't they launch their own "NUCs" and motherboards?
     
    #9
  10. Patrick

    Patrick Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,313
    Likes Received:
    4,263
    #10
  11. zir_blazer

    zir_blazer Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2016
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    47
    I had an idea that AMD should actually design "reference Motherboards", which they technically do for their own internal platform prototypes, but they should license it to their Motherboard partners to manufacture it and give support and warranty. Can't see why it shouldn't work when it already does for reference Video Cards...

    I think that a massive advantage would be that if AMD designed a Motherboard from the ground up, they could decide what market to cater. They could roll their own Coreboot port and hand pick the other support chips of the platform based on end user documentation, and go open source where it matters (I could also rant about how much I dislike the 100% libre guys that wants even open source microcode and other things that would get into an eternal lawyer maze, when I think that getting a community maintenable BIOS or UEFI implementation without begging the Motherboard manufacturer is far more important short term). AMD could also implement those present but rarely used features, like DASH.


    I recall that I asked Supermicro about if they were intending to do an overclockeable Workstation-level LGA 1151 Motherboard, since the Xeons E3 1200v5 required a C232 or C236 Chipset, and they were the first to do Base Clock overclocking on Skylake, making such Motherboard a rather interesing niche product. I got a response that they were going to elevate my suggestion.
    Supermicro eventually appeared in the market with the C7C232-CB-ML, which is around what other manufacturers did (For some reason no one made one with a C236, which was required to use the IGP). Sadly, for Supermicro the party finished before it started, it was too late. By then, Intel already issued microcode upgrades that removed Base Clock overclocking in Skylake, and the niche wasn't very popular to begin with. Is sad cause it doesn't seem that they are economically encouraged to commit to do a revolutionary product, even when they seem to be honestly trying to get into the enthusiast market segment.
     
    #11
  12. msg7086

    msg7086 Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2017
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    15
    8 Zen cores, quad channel memory, 2x10Gbe, 16 SATA/NVMe, make it MATX with 2xPCIe x16.

    Oh man I can't hold my breath XD
     
    #12
  13. zir_blazer

    zir_blazer Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2016
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    47
    Actually, I think that it would be excellent even with a single Zen die. Socket AM4 is rather underwhelming because it can't use a Zen die 32 PCIe Lanes, just 24 (16x for a single slot or 8x/8x, 4x typically for NVMe, and 4x for Chipset). The embedded Zen has no such limitation and thus you can actually use the extra 8 lanes. The dual Zen die EPYC is pretty much a ThreadRipper, and it is not as interesing as the single die Zen precisely because ThreadRipper already had the 2 * 32 lanes available. Another advantage of the embedded ones is official ECC RAM support.

    Just think what could you do with 32 Lanes from a Ryzen SoC with no Chipset. The only thing where it is a bit underwhelming is that it only has 4 USB 3.0 and would absolutely need a third party controller. A ThunderBolt 3 could provide two more USB 3.1 but take 4 lanes. You can also use 4 lanes for 2 * 10 Gbps NICs. I think its perfect for an mATX Form Factor.
    Raven Ridge would actually be even better if it wasn't because it has 8 lanes less than Zen (Not sure if die is missing them, or no product actually said that it also had a total of 32), but you get a beastly IGP in exchange of 4 cores.
     
    #13
  14. msg7086

    msg7086 Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2017
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    15
    I can live with that honestly. Not many things could saturate 4 USB 3.0 ports, and you can always get a hub somewhere around, even keyboards and monitors nowadays integrate USB 3.0 hubs.

    Add an IGP and it's HTPC+NAS. Add 4x Gbe and it's a (overkill) router+NAS. Add Reg ECC support and it's a VM lab.

    So many possibilities here XD
     
    #14
  15. hjfr

    hjfr Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    18
    Some news about AMD Epyc Embedded 3000 series motherboards ?
    I didn't find anything
     
    #15
  16. amalurk

    amalurk Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2016
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    14
  17. Patrick

    Patrick Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,313
    Likes Received:
    4,263
    I saw one in Taiwan at the end of October. IPMI + EPYC 3000. Expected to land Q1 2019.
     
    #17
    maes likes this.
  18. jasaero

    jasaero New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    1
    Mini-ITX??
     
    #18
  19. Patrick

    Patrick Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,313
    Likes Received:
    4,263
    Yes
     
    #19
    jasaero likes this.
  20. EffrafaxOfWug

    EffrafaxOfWug Radioactive Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2015
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    280
    *ears prick up*

    I don't know how much you're able to divulge, but is this from a "good" server board vendor or from a relative no-name...? And do you know whether you'll be able to snag one to review if and when they're released?
     
    #20
Similar Threads: EPYC Embedded
Forum Title Date
Processors and Motherboards Overclock your AMD Epyc Feb 5, 2019
Processors and Motherboards Why such a poor Epyc Workstation MB lineup? Dec 17, 2018
Processors and Motherboards Does an Amd epyc 7xxx run with unregistered RAM? Dec 13, 2018
Processors and Motherboards Epyc in AM4 Dec 4, 2018
Processors and Motherboards Intel IMDT + Optane (DC P4800X) + EPYC Nov 19, 2018

Share This Page