12,000 TBW endurance, 2,500 TB writes per SMART, 100% health?

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

zac1

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2022
432
358
63
I just got a bunch of SM863 1.92TB SSDs that report 100% health with total host writes of 2457421 GB (~2457 TBW) according to CrystalDiskInfo. The SM863 1.92TB is rated for 12,320TBW. The math doesn't seem to check out.

I need to do more research but wanted to check: does anybody happen to have any insights on this?
 

i386

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2016
4,273
1,568
113
35
Germany
the rating is a "guesstimate" from the vendor/manufacturer (for market segementation?)
the health indicator is calculated by the firmware/ssd controller and how many reserved/overprovisioned nand is used instead of the normal "nand".
 

zac1

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2022
432
358
63
CrystalDiskInfo seems overly optimistic. HD Sentinel guesstimates ~93%.
 

zac1

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2022
432
358
63
use samsung magician for DC, they will do the math right
I'm planning to do that, but it requires a direct SATA connection. UASP doesn't seem to work, so I need to find an efficient way of going about it. I guess a half-open chassis with SATA cables sticking out is it.
 

ano

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2022
662
274
63
I'm planning to do that, but it requires a direct SATA connection. UASP doesn't seem to work, so I need to find an efficient way of going about it. I guess a half-open chassis with SATA cables sticking out is it.
this is the way, I have a machine for that in the lab.

I managed to get it working in supermicro expanders and such years ago when they were new and this was a hot thing... but... I cannot recreate it?! tried with a 9500, maybe I need an older HBA, its on the todo.

I a quantity of drives I need to check, and no 1:1 cabinets laying around
 
Last edited: