I have a little machine running a single E5-2630L V3. It is a 22nm part, 55W TDP. Overall power consumption is higher than the D-1541 because of the C602 PCH and higher TDP. Base clock is better on the D-1541 as is the architecture (Broadwell v. Haswell.) The E5-2630L V3 does have slightly higher max turbo clocks, more cache and quad memory channels.
Many folks that ask for larger systems I recommend the E5 over the Xeon D line. Usually, this is due to the higher-end expansion capabilities of the E5 V3/V4 platform. I do really like the Xeon D, for smaller systems, but the E5 V3/ V4 UP line gets more attractive as you move up the Broadwell-DE stack to higher priced SKUs.
I had not done the comparison between these two chips before so I wanted to see which folks think would be faster.
Here is the ARK side-by-side.
I am going to tally based on 4 points of comparison:
1. Python Linux Compile Benchmark Speed
2. c-ray 1.1 speed
3. UnixBench Single thread Whetstone/Dhrystone
4. Monero Mining performance (L3 cache/ 2 threads to maximize Xeon D performance.)
Which do you think wins?
Many folks that ask for larger systems I recommend the E5 over the Xeon D line. Usually, this is due to the higher-end expansion capabilities of the E5 V3/V4 platform. I do really like the Xeon D, for smaller systems, but the E5 V3/ V4 UP line gets more attractive as you move up the Broadwell-DE stack to higher priced SKUs.
I had not done the comparison between these two chips before so I wanted to see which folks think would be faster.
Here is the ARK side-by-side.
I am going to tally based on 4 points of comparison:
1. Python Linux Compile Benchmark Speed
2. c-ray 1.1 speed
3. UnixBench Single thread Whetstone/Dhrystone
4. Monero Mining performance (L3 cache/ 2 threads to maximize Xeon D performance.)
Which do you think wins?