I have 1GBit/1Gbit in my apartment, don't know what to do with all that bandwidth... I pay the equivalent of 15 dollars a month for it
Ok, I'm jealous of your 7 up connection. I get "up to" 60 down and "up to" 4 up.I have Charter and made sure I didn't rent a place that was under Comcast. I get 60 down and 7 up. It's not too bad but I really want them to increase the upload speed. A few issue I've had
- My neighbor got Charter and they came out while we were out of town and messed up our connection. Took a few days to solve that but since we work from home periodicity it ended up being a miss timed hassle.
- The internet goes down for a minute multiple times a week (3 -4). It doesn't normally impact end user experience but Sophos sends out an email every time it comes back up. I'm not sure this is normal for residential ISP.
For paying around $50 a month I'm a pretty happy customer but that's because I have the best ISP for my area and the monopoly system really doesn't drive innovation. I'm hoping that our next move puts us near 100+mb/s, I've seen some buildings with 1 gb/s which would be incredible.
Ok, I'm jealous of your 7 up connection. I get "up to" 60 down and "up to" 4 up.
5GHz FTWI get Charter. Wired isn't bad, but most nights trying to stream even one show on Hulu or Netflix over wireless just doesn't work. Although I think that is caused by the fact that there are so many wireless signals in my apartment building.
So businesses don't get the cheaper home plans. Plus, they don't want you running a web server out of your house.Oh man yeah that's rough. Does anyone know if there is a technical reason that ISPs kill upload speeds? I'm guessing because there isn't any demand from residential customers
Even the 5GHz band in my building is getting crowded. Working on getting a house so that should help a lot.5GHz FTW
Cable/DSL use one physical medium for upload and download and basically max out the utilization of the medium. At a given signaling rate on a simplex medium, the only way to increase upload speed is to reduce download speed. In general, consumers don't use (essentially any) upload bandwidth and only really care about download bandwidth--so prioritizing download speeds is a no-brainer. Verizon can provision symmetric service relatively easily given how much headroom there is on fiber and because they have finer grained control over upstream allocation, and is doing so as a marketing win over the cable providers who can't do the same thing for technical reasons. In practice, it doesn't matter to the end user. (And anyone who does actually max out their upload will likely run afoul of the TOS unless they're business class.)Oh man yeah that's rough. Does anyone know if there is a technical reason that ISPs kill upload speeds? I'm guessing because there isn't any demand from residential customers
Older ONTs only negotiate 100Mbps. If you order a higher service tier they should install a new one. The other possibility is a bad cable, you can test that with a laptop at the outside interface.Currently on Verizon Fios 75/75 real world speeds I get around 85/82 as Verizon adds a nice fluff for VOD usage. was going to move to 175/175 but need to figure out why my run from the ONT to router is only negotiating at 100mbit. 300/300 is to rich for my blood.
I have the newer ONT. I think its the cable run. When I get a free weekend I will pull everything apart. The run goes between my garage and home office. So there is two keystone jacks one on each side then 2 patch cables. One to the ONT other into switch so multiple spots of failure.Older ONTs only negotiate 100Mbps. If you order a higher service tier they should install a new one. The other possibility is a bad cable, you can test that with a laptop at the outside interface.
I am jealous of what you pay. I pay $40 for my 60/4 cable connection. Also like your name, brings back memories of Monkey Island.I use a 1Gbps FTTH with a 100Mbps cable modem backup for approx USD 42/mth.
With the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite, I configured the cable modem to be a failover backup as well as used for guest access.
Don't run any home labs, my server and NAS is at a nearby datacenter location. With the FTTH, it's less than 10msec latency and full bandwidth access to my servers
SCORE!!AT&T finally isolated the problem with my service - the latest tech recrimped the end of the cable run that was attached to the ONT. No dropped connections or calls since. Unfortunately, it didn't solve the problem of 24/4 being the highest tier of service available in my neighborhood (on FTTH, no less). The tech let it slip that Comcast was an option. Our home is new construction (~18 months) and the builder led me to believe that AT&T was our only option for data service.
Talked to a Comcast rep yesterday, according to their map (they have to survey to make sure) I can get up to 150/25. Looks like I'll be dropping my Uverse account. I'm going to get 75/15 with a Static for the same price I'm paying for Uverse for 24/4 and two phone lines that haven't been reliable for the last eight months months. Later on I'll roll an Asterisk VM and figure out VoIP