You're 100% incorrect, no "theory" needed here
I have experience with both those drives and many more as do many others here who will tell you the same thing.
I suggest you read the forums more about comparing consumer drives to enterprise drives or go look at the very few sites that run steady-state performance of enterprise and also include some consumer for comparison (very hard to find).
Most of those "FAST" consumer drives drop below 10,000 iops, a lot below 5,000 and certain ones once out of cache will drop to 900-1500.
If you don't believe me try out 12 consumer drives vs 12 s3610 and come back and share your experiences... you need to test them appropriately too, consistently for hours. Or, put them to 'real use' and report back in a month or two how slow they've gotten.
If you're running a 4GB or 8GB test then yeah, that's bad results\data that's useless.
The answer to your question is performance and QOS require more overhead, and that = power and performance = power. The cache on consumer = less power to hit high IOPs where the enterprise require higher power to provide this consistently 100% across the entire capacity while also maintaining low latency\consistency. (This is also why samsung while similar iop rating perform worse than Intel enterprise. From what I've seen Samsung has improved on this, but I haven't gotten any of their new drives to compare and test with yet.)