I hope this is the right section -- openstack questions seem spread across various sections on this site.
I am looking to set up a small openstack cluster here at home. It is mostly to learn. I was thinking of using multiple physical nodes to get a feel for where the bottlenecks are rather than a one box virtualized node. But, I could probably be convinced otherwise.
By small, I mean maybe a dozen instances with 4-16 G RAM and 2-4 cores a few hundred GB of disc each. It is small enough I could probably stuff it all on a single VMware server if I tried.
I am hoping I can leverage some/all of the equipment I already own to constrain costs. I would love to have a bunch of Xeon D nodes and multiple 10G networks but that's well and truly out of the budget.
I have a supermicro 6026TT-HDTRF with two nodes each running a pair of X5670's that I figured would make pretty dandy compute nodes. They are busy crunching BOINC cobbles for me but I can repurpose them.
My first real stopper was figuring out what to use as a controller node and/or a network node. I do not expectmuch external traffic but can dedicate a machine to the network node if it will help visualize a larger network. The documentation is pretty vague on how processor / memory intensive the controller and network nodes are. Can I get away with something like a celeron for those or are dual xeons more appropriate? I have some of each, and a few grades in between I can use for this project.
Is an x9scl with 16-32GB ram and an i3 sufficient for a controller node for openstack cluster of this size or should I plan on an x8dte? I have a modest selection of Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge and Westmere gear that can be easily repurposed for the duration of this fun.
I have similar question for a network node.
I expect that storage nodes will be a completely different game when I get around to them.
Please be gentle with me
I am looking to set up a small openstack cluster here at home. It is mostly to learn. I was thinking of using multiple physical nodes to get a feel for where the bottlenecks are rather than a one box virtualized node. But, I could probably be convinced otherwise.
By small, I mean maybe a dozen instances with 4-16 G RAM and 2-4 cores a few hundred GB of disc each. It is small enough I could probably stuff it all on a single VMware server if I tried.
I am hoping I can leverage some/all of the equipment I already own to constrain costs. I would love to have a bunch of Xeon D nodes and multiple 10G networks but that's well and truly out of the budget.
I have a supermicro 6026TT-HDTRF with two nodes each running a pair of X5670's that I figured would make pretty dandy compute nodes. They are busy crunching BOINC cobbles for me but I can repurpose them.
My first real stopper was figuring out what to use as a controller node and/or a network node. I do not expectmuch external traffic but can dedicate a machine to the network node if it will help visualize a larger network. The documentation is pretty vague on how processor / memory intensive the controller and network nodes are. Can I get away with something like a celeron for those or are dual xeons more appropriate? I have some of each, and a few grades in between I can use for this project.
Is an x9scl with 16-32GB ram and an i3 sufficient for a controller node for openstack cluster of this size or should I plan on an x8dte? I have a modest selection of Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge and Westmere gear that can be easily repurposed for the duration of this fun.
I have similar question for a network node.
I expect that storage nodes will be a completely different game when I get around to them.
Please be gentle with me