No I had to rescue two drives myself, i'm far from local from @epicurean lol...you helped @epicurean and used ddrescue to save his data?
No I had to rescue two drives myself, i'm far from local from @epicurean lol...you helped @epicurean and used ddrescue to save his data?
A former flatmate used to work for a data recovery firm (mostly forensic work for legal cases but did personal recoveries as well), ddrescue and photorec and friends were indeed the bread and butter of their business - and I think because they charged per GB recovered, it was basically a license to print money. Thankfully they did have coders writing some custom gubbins and did contribute code back to the open source projects (they didn't have to since they weren't distributing the resulting code).First of all - don’t pay a single red cent for software recovery unless the open source/free tool options are proven ineffective - my guess is that 50-75% of the data recovery software out there are just recompiled versions of open source stuff that’s available out there.
If you really attract the attention from glowing in the dark types, only one option is suitable:As an aside, anyone who tells you a hard drive needs overwriting at least seven times with cryptographically random data is wrong. A single overwrite from /dev/zero is easily enough to render the original data completely unreadable. You're liable to only get data out of reallocated sectors.
I connected the faulty drive directly via the sata port. I prepare a similar 5TB drive in another sata port ( to do the cloning) and that drive showed up fine.How is it connected to the machine? USB-to-SATA connector? Directly attached via the SATA Port? Does sudo dmesg | grep sd even show a device being plugged in?
Well, I was referring more to the idea of buying those overpriced "recovery software" (often shrilled by fake review or help sites) rather than actual data recovery shops.A former flatmate used to work for a data recovery firm (mostly forensic work for legal cases but did personal recoveries as well), ddrescue and photorec and friends were indeed the bread and butter of their business - and I think because they charged per GB recovered, it was basically a license to print money. Thankfully they did have coders writing some custom gubbins and did contribute code back to the open source projects (they didn't have to since they weren't distributing the resulting code).
The work they did on physical media repair was pretty impressive though - they kept stacks of hundreds of different types of HDD controller boards, clean rooms in case platters needed to be transplanted in to other drives, all manner of stuff for repairing LTO tapes, hundreds of different tape, floppy and optical drives (many of them using custom firmware or hacked controllers to assist with data recovery). Brand new in was a colossally expensive pile of kit whereupon you could de-solder flash chips from SSDs and there was I think an FPGA that could emulate SSD controllers to extract the data.
As an aside, anyone who tells you a hard drive needs overwriting at least seven times with cryptographically random data is wrong. A single overwrite from /dev/zero is easily enough to render the original data completely unreadable. You're liable to only get data out of reallocated sectors.
The message to me is always clear - it's much, much cheaper to pay for a good backup strategy than it is to ever engage a recovery specialist
Okay, so the question now is whether the drive is legitimately dead (it could happen - even if it spins up it can still be deader than a doornail) or if the software environment is simply not seeing it.I connected the faulty drive directly via the sata port. I prepare a similar 5TB drive in another sata port ( to do the cloning) and that drive showed up fine.
sorry, but I still need help! much thanks.