I was planning to build a backup/mass storage nas using 16*6tb WD red drives (two raid z2 pools) but after seeing recent prices of nvme ssds (crucial p3 plus to be exact) I was thinking of using 16*4tb crucial p3s in raidz1 mode to get close to the same total available storage, if I factor in price of hba and cables and such the total cost of both is not gonna be that far off each other.
obviously the HDD route is much more expandable and it has two redundant drives per pool on the other hand the nvme route has speed, ease of installation, power consumption in its favor.
the priority for the stored data is it's safety but I'm not sure how can I translate hdd reliability to ssds especially if we are talking zfs and raid z.
I do plan to expand the storage in the future However I`m not gonna need a a lot of raw capacity (this 40-50 tb setup is going to be enough for quite a while) so I still think the nvme route gonna be able to handle even the expansion (mb has 7* x16 pcie 4.0 ports).
so all and all which one would you people advice?
obviously the HDD route is much more expandable and it has two redundant drives per pool on the other hand the nvme route has speed, ease of installation, power consumption in its favor.
the priority for the stored data is it's safety but I'm not sure how can I translate hdd reliability to ssds especially if we are talking zfs and raid z.
I do plan to expand the storage in the future However I`m not gonna need a a lot of raw capacity (this 40-50 tb setup is going to be enough for quite a while) so I still think the nvme route gonna be able to handle even the expansion (mb has 7* x16 pcie 4.0 ports).
so all and all which one would you people advice?