Recent content by JosefHrib

Now I waiting on new 128GB 8000MHz DDR5 RDIMM Micron, Monolithic 32 Gb Die. For test I pre-ordered only two pieces (256GB), but if will be ok so in future I will buy more pieces. Hopefully I won't have to wait a long time...

Oh, this he meant. But this information about PCIe lines is known from the beginning for both boards ace sage or not.

What do you mean "just SAGE is crippled"? I do not understand you. SPR-SP will always have less PCIe lanes with W790, whether ACE or SAGE.

I love my hermaphrodite. :cool:

Before QYFS I had AMD Threadripper PRO 5965WX 24cores 48threads + ASUS Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI I with 8x64GB Samsung DDR3 3200MHz and XFX Speedster SWFT 319 AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT. And for me is Intel QYFS is better. :)

I have QYFS and it is good processor.

For me works best first available version 0215.

Yes, I agree with that on 100%. :) Some older applications, games, or here older benchmark can works better with some deactivated cores. @DHamov For my work flow and my few games is this not better, I prefer always more cores. But a hundred people a hundred opinions. Each person may prefer...

Yes, it is true. If it can help, I can post here my results with RTX3090Ti with my i9-13900KS (I created test in July 2023). I go find it. Below you can find my stress test from July 2023 with my i9-13900KS+RTX3090Ti, and QYFS+RTX3080Ti,QYFS+RTX4090. 20230831 QYFS+RTX3080Ti 3DMark Speed Way...

In my bios (first version 0215) is option set PCIe speed. Yes, my results are with enabled all options in bios ReBAR,Above4G,etc.

Few days back I try 3DMark Time Spy Extreme, but only one time, with many applications under load and without fresh start (machine was poweron many days). My Time Spy Extreme with RTX4090 and QYFS: Graphics Score 10998 CPU Score 14060 I not playing many games (only few, Cyberpunk 2077, Flight...

Non RTX3090Ti, normal RTX3090 vs RTX3080Ti is very similar in performance with RTX3090 and RTX3090Ti, main difference is memory size. And because before I bought RTX4090 I owned RTX3080Ti so I can post here some results from 3DMark. But with my older GPUI have results only from Test: 3DMark...

The test was performed on production computer where many applications are running in the background, etc., the usage ram was about 30GB. I didn't make any adjustments just for retesting. Therefore, the results are not quite the best. If I restarted the computer and turned off all background...

My board W790E-SAGE is 8 channel and I using 8 modules. Best case scenario. If you have 4 channel with 4 slots so best case scenario are 4 modules. Now I retested with AIDA64 7.00.6700 results are very similar.

True, true. For example I myself previously owned one piece i9-13900K, and two pieces i9-13900KS. And the first piece of i9-13900KS was worse than the normal Non-S variant. If you want, so you can pickup my results CBR23 as standart (+-). Because I set only ram modules to xmp1 and under win11...