Long shot but I don't suppose anyone has a 7250-24 PoE board that they'd be willing part with?
Finally managed to pick a 7250 up off ebay after waiting 9 months for one to come up with a non-daft price (they're very rare here in the UK it seems) and it's got a blown PD69208 chip on the PoE...
Fortunately I've got everything in a rack in the garage so noise isn't a massive concern, I'll probably regret making this statement but they can't be much louder than the the Brocade FC switches I've got :confused:.
Unfortunatly they still go for £1k+ here so I won't be getting one for a...
Yeh I'm the guy from reddit.
I agree with you for the money they're a decent switch, they just have some foibles like anything else. I'd probably rather have a Nexus 3064 but they're 3-4x the price and will come with another set of drawbacks to work around. It's good to hear that they're still...
It's immaturity, probably driven by a lack of development focus/effort/priority.
Plenty of other mainstream vendors supported these concepts on older platforms that reached EoL before the 6610 did.
/126 is pretty standard for P2P links when you don't want to burn /64s (and avoid neighbor...
I'd agree with the immaturity with v6 from my experience, so far I've run into:
1. /126 subnets don't work properly. A 6610 will only work as when assigned the second address, anything else results in 'bad scope' errors. They do work correctly on a 6450 though these use a different...
Picked myself up a 6450 as a gateway to a 6610 hopefully, after years of Cisco the CLI is just similar/different enough to be annoying :p.
I see that OSPFv3 is supported on a 6450 in a mixed stack where I presume it works just as a FEX and all the management plane functions are ran from the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.