WTB: LSI SAS9200-16e HBA

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.
e97

e97

Active Member
Jun 3, 2015
324
194
43
I'd rather buy from an STH'er if they are selling one rather than an ebay seller :shrug:

ajs said:
Interesting.. I can't seem to tell what is causing the extra 4w power consumption between the two. Do you know the reason?
Click to expand...
9201 is physically smaller => different layout and heard maybe a different power IC


9201 has a newer architecture:

The difference between the two is the internal architecture. The 9201-16e is built on the Fusion-MPT 2.0 tech, whereas the 9200-16e is Fusion-MPT 1.0.

This means in the real world:
1. more IOPS for the 9201-16e (430000 vs 290000, you will not reach that unless you load it up with high end SSDs)
2. Better driver support on Linux/Solaris
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Samir
BeTeP

BeTeP

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2019
657
433
63
Even manafacturer's datasheets are not always accurate. The original SAS9200-16e was clocked at 533MHz. Then they overclocked it to 800MHz. I think they just did not update the power stats in the datasheet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Samir
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom