Hi Everyone...
It's just a thought that has been on my mind quite a bit lately. Sequential Speeds obviously have saturated the bus at this point in time, but I'm wondering why we havnen't seen random read / write operations getting closer to saturating the bus.
It seems to me that is a much more important metric than the sequential speeds, and since NVME can easily be faster in those departments, why hasn't that trickled down to SATA drives.
I'd love to see a drive where both the sequential and random io were both capable of saturating the bus when needed. That would make my fully sata / sas investment last several years longer than changing everything out for nvme access.
What do you all think?
Thanks, and Happy Holidays
Marshall
It's just a thought that has been on my mind quite a bit lately. Sequential Speeds obviously have saturated the bus at this point in time, but I'm wondering why we havnen't seen random read / write operations getting closer to saturating the bus.
It seems to me that is a much more important metric than the sequential speeds, and since NVME can easily be faster in those departments, why hasn't that trickled down to SATA drives.
I'd love to see a drive where both the sequential and random io were both capable of saturating the bus when needed. That would make my fully sata / sas investment last several years longer than changing everything out for nvme access.
What do you all think?
Thanks, and Happy Holidays
Marshall