What about VirtualBox?

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

NeverDie

Active Member
Jan 28, 2015
307
27
28
USA
I notice VirtualBox in the header for this sub-forum, and yet looking through the postings it has barely even been mentioned. Is VirtualBox fatally flawed? Too slow perhaps? Or are ESXi and Proxmox simply heaps better than it?

I notice Gnome Boxes doesn't get mentioned either, but it's only fairly recent.
 

nickscott18

Member
Mar 15, 2013
77
19
8
I notice VirtualBox in the header for this sub-forum, and yet looking through the postings it has barely even been mentioned. Is VirtualBox fatally flawed? Too slow perhaps? Or are ESXi and Proxmox simply heaps better than it?

I notice Gnome Boxes doesn't get mentioned either, but it's only fairly recent.
To me, virtual box is more desktop virtualization software, rather than server virtualization. I use it on my work laptop to virtualize windows xp for development purposes, and have run an app server from it (to have a complete Dev environment locally when working remotely).
 

nickscott18

Member
Mar 15, 2013
77
19
8
And a quick footnote - at home, I'm now using Hyper V (since I purchased Windows 8 Pro), I figure why install something else when the standard software works fine for my needs. Used to use Virtual Box, and would have no qualms about going back to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T_Minus

mackle

Active Member
Nov 13, 2013
221
40
28
My understanding is that development of Virtualbox has effectively stalled, while other implementations (VMWare etc) are continuing to evolve...
 

Rhinox

Member
May 27, 2013
144
26
18
My understanding is that development of Virtualbox has effectively stalled, while other implementations (VMWare etc) are continuing to evolve...
Problem is its current owner: what Oracle gets in hands, that is dying slowly. With VirtualBox it is the same as it was/is with OpenOffice, MySQL, Solaris, Java, OpenSSO, etc. That company has long tradition of burying good software...
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoredSysadmin

andrewbedia

Well-Known Member
Jan 11, 2013
701
258
63
Problem is its current owner: what Oracle gets in hands, that is dying slowly. With VirtualBox it is the same as it was/is with OpenOffice, MySQL, Solaris, Java, OpenSSO, etc. That company has long tradition of burying good software...
**** oracle and the horse they rode in on. Absolutely agreed.
 

Bert

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2018
840
392
63
45
Activating this old thread. I am now considering to use virtualbox on my linux system but I am amazed how rudimentary the system is although as a freeware it is much better vmware.

Is virtualbox deadend? Knowing oracle, I guess Oracle really put Virtualbox on a deadend as their only purpose for open source is to somehow make money with premium features.
 

acquacow

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2017
786
439
63
42
Activating this old thread. I am now considering to use virtualbox on my linux system but I am amazed how rudimentary the system is although as a freeware it is much better vmware.

Is virtualbox deadend? Knowing oracle, I guess Oracle really put Virtualbox on a deadend as their only purpose for open source is to somehow make money with premium features.
You're on linux, use KVM like everyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bert and Marjan

Endoftheworld

New Member
Sep 5, 2016
5
1
3
51
Activating this old thread. I am now considering to use virtualbox on my linux system but I am amazed how rudimentary the system is although as a freeware it is much better vmware.

Is virtualbox deadend? Knowing oracle, I guess Oracle really put Virtualbox on a deadend as their only purpose for open source is to somehow make money with premium features.
Virtualbox, despite limitations, is still huge among gamers, bloggers and other casual users. It's not for most of us here but I don't see it dying off unless Oracle pull the plug on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bert

Bert

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2018
840
392
63
45
I took the suggestion and I am on KVM now. It is working fine for me.