Unlocking Any Brand SFP modules on Intel X710
- Thread starter seb101
- Start date
Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.
git clone GitHub - bibigon812/xl710-unlocker: Unlock Intel XL710 / X710 cards for use with any SFP+
with second one
Code:
root@proxmox:/tmp/test# git clone GitHub - terpstra/xl710-unlocker: Unlock Intel XL710 / X710 cards for use with any SFP+
Cloning into 'xl710-unlocker'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 22, done.
remote: Total 22 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 22 (from 1)
Receiving objects: 100% (22/22), 4.75 KiB | 4.75 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (7/7), done.
root@proxmox:/tmp/test# ls
xl710-unlocker
root@proxmox:/tmp/test# cd xl710-unlocker
root@proxmox:/tmp/test/xl710-unlocker# ls
Makefile mypoke.c mytool.c README.md syscalls.h
root@proxmox:/tmp/test/xl710-unlocker# make
gcc -Wall -O2 mytool.c -o mytool
mytool.c: In function ‘main’:
mytool.c:33:16: error: ‘FILL_ME_IN’ undeclared (first use in this function)
33 | int devid = FILL_ME_IN; // 0x1572 = Intel X710 DA4
| ^~~~~~~~~~
mytool.c:33:16: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
make: *** [Makefile:9: mytool] Error 1
root@proxmox:/tmp/test/xl710-unlocker# ls
Makefile mypoke.c mytool.c README.md syscalls.h
root@proxmox:/tmp/test/xl710-unlocker#
Code:
root@proxmox:/tmp/test/xl710-unlocker# lspci -n
00:00.0 0600: 1022:1450
00:01.0 0600: 1022:1452
00:01.1 0604: 1022:1453
00:01.3 0604: 1022:1453
00:01.4 0604: 1022:1453
00:01.5 0604: 1022:1453
00:02.0 0600: 1022:1452
00:03.0 0600: 1022:1452
00:03.1 0604: 1022:1453
00:04.0 0600: 1022:1452
00:07.0 0600: 1022:1452
00:07.1 0604: 1022:1454
00:08.0 0600: 1022:1452
00:08.1 0604: 1022:1454
00:14.0 0c05: 1022:790b (rev 59)
00:14.3 0601: 1022:790e (rev 51)
00:18.0 0600: 1022:1460
00:18.1 0600: 1022:1461
00:18.2 0600: 1022:1462
00:18.3 0600: 1022:1463
00:18.4 0600: 1022:1464
00:18.5 0600: 1022:1465
00:18.6 0600: 1022:1466
00:18.7 0600: 1022:1467
01:00.0 0604: 1a03:1150 (rev 04)
02:00.0 0300: 1a03:2000 (rev 41)
03:00.0 0108: 1987:5012 (rev 01)
04:00.0 0200: 8086:1533 (rev 03)
05:00.0 0200: 8086:1533 (rev 03)
06:00.0 0200: 8086:1583 (rev 02)
06:00.1 0200: 8086:1583 (rev 02)
07:00.0 1300: 1022:145a
07:00.2 1080: 1022:1456
07:00.3 0c03: 1022:145f
08:00.0 1300: 1022:1455
08:00.1 1080: 1022:1468
08:00.2 0106: 1022:7901 (rev 51)
08:00.3 0403: 1022:145706:00.0 0200: 8086:1583 (rev 02)
06:00.1 0200: 8086:1583 (rev 02)
those are my xl710 nic's
Last edited:
I would've expected the one you used first to work.
GitHub - bibigon812/xl710-unlocker: Unlock Intel XL710 / X710 cards for use with any SFP+
Unlock Intel XL710 / X710 cards for use with any SFP+ - bibigon812/xl710-unlocker
github.com
Not sure what the issue is, but live booting a more standard distro might be a good idea, just in case.
You could also try a slightly older version of a distro known to work at the time previous posts were made, in case a kernel or distro change broke the tool.tell You what, i've changed id in xl710_unlock.c file to my 1583 , make it and when i tried to runn it worked, asked if i want to unlock and then prompt said that is already unlocked... i have juniper dac and on it it's also not working.
Code:
root@proxmox:/tmp/test/xl710-unlocker# ./xl710_unlock -n enp6s0f0np0
EMP SR offset: 0x6676
PHY offset: 0x67c2
PHY data struct size: 0x000b
MISC: 0x0710 <- unlocked
MISC: 0x0710 <- unlocked
MISC: 0x0710 <- unlocked
MISC: 0x0710 <- unlocked
Ready to fix it? [y/N]: y
not changing, already unlocked in PHY struct 0 at offset 0x67c2
not changing, already unlocked in PHY struct 1 at offset 0x67ce
not changing, already unlocked in PHY struct 2 at offset 0x67da
not changing, already unlocked in PHY struct 3 at offset 0x67e6
root@proxmox:/tmp/test/xl710-unlocker#
Code:
Intel(R) Ethernet NVM Update Tool
NVMUpdate version 1.43.20.0
Copyright(C) 2013 - 2025 Intel Corporation.
WARNING: To avoid damage to your device, do not stop the update or reboot or power off the system during this update.
Inventory in progress. Please wait [..|*******]
Num Description Ver.(hex) DevId S:B Status
=== ================================== ============ ===== ====== ==============
01) Intel(R) Ethernet Converged 9.85(9.55) 1583 00:006 Up to date
Network Adapter XL710-Q2
Tool execution completed with the following status: All operations completed successfully.
Press any key to exit.
Last edited:
and sfp mudule programmer it's seven times the price of one of those cards i've got... the module is rebranded avago one. 9 euro for one module.
Also, having a problem on a Dell r630 with XL710 NIC. Originally, it was an Oracle XL710 NIC (that never worked right). Cross-flashed it to the latest Intel XL710 firmware today.
The Dell r630, reports transceiver issues during system post, so guessing it is locked. Tried that unlocker utility and receive similar messages stating the NIC is *unlocked*.
With Debian Linux, only 1 of 2 transceiver ports work for this NIC. I am using the same transceiver/fiber cable and switching between ports on the NIC, only one of the two ports work at 40GB.
dmesg output:
enp129s0f1np1: NIC Link is Up, 40 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
enp129s0f0np0:
Will generate "i40e 0000:81:00.0: failed to get phy cap., ret = -EIO last_status = I40E_AQ_RC_EAGAIN".
Unsure why enp129s0f1np1 works, but not enp129s0f0np0?
The Dell r630, reports transceiver issues during system post, so guessing it is locked. Tried that unlocker utility and receive similar messages stating the NIC is *unlocked*.
With Debian Linux, only 1 of 2 transceiver ports work for this NIC. I am using the same transceiver/fiber cable and switching between ports on the NIC, only one of the two ports work at 40GB.
dmesg output:
enp129s0f1np1: NIC Link is Up, 40 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
enp129s0f0np0:
Will generate "i40e 0000:81:00.0: failed to get phy cap., ret = -EIO last_status = I40E_AQ_RC_EAGAIN".
Unsure why enp129s0f1np1 works, but not enp129s0f0np0?
Last edited:
Weird. Does it work if you use the kernel parameter to disable the vendor lock in the driver? That should indicate whether it's due to the vendor locking or something else.
and sfp mudule programmer it's seven times the price of one of those cards i've got... the module is rebranded avago one. 9 euro for one module.
Which kernel parameter will disable the vendor lock in the driver? Is this something that can be added within /etc/modprobe.d. ? If so, please specify what it is. That xl710-unlocker utility doesn't appear to work
Try adding the following:
options i40e allow_unsupported_sfp=1,1That assumes a dual port NIC. I'm not entirely sure that the parameter is used by the X710 driver though.
Last edited:
Does anyone know of an SFP+ -> RJ45 transceiver that will allow pfSense to negotiate at 2.5G? Right now, I'm using a Realtek NIC for my WAN, which isn't ideal since once an update comes out, I'm SOL for updating the driver. X710 is used for LAN and has an open cage. The one SFP+ -> RJ45 transceiver I have will not negotiate at any speed (not even 1G, but my modem tries to negotiate at 2.5G).
I don’t think the X710 SFP can do 2.5G and they negotiate funny. The L NICs support 2.5 but not the standard X710 https://www.servethehome.com/intel-x710-t4l-quad-10gbase-t-nic-review-massive-upgrade/
There are 10GBASE-T SFP+ transceivers like those using Aquantia PHYs that link up at 10G to the NIC/switch and then negotiate lower speeds to the RJ45 side (using Flow Control to slow down traffic to the lower speed). Those generally work even in legacy 10G devices that only support 1G and 10G.
You can try one of the Aquantia AQC113 based transceivers. It very well might work, as long as it is programmed to appear as a 10GBASE-SR transceiver.
The 10Gtek ASF-10G2-T (note the "2" in there) is one of them if I'm not mistaken. There are also several on AliExpress from brands like Xicom etc. that also use it. It's one of the older 30 meter rated models so power consumption and heat generation is higher than the modern PHYs. That can potentially limit compatibility with NICs.
The other option is to pick up a cheap 2.5G switch with SFP+ uplinks and a DAC, not exactly elegant, but it works. I haven't played with any of the super cheap managed models, they might not work the best, but if you got one which supports VLANs and trunk to the router you could use the other switch ports for LAN devices.
Any idea on where to get that specific model of 10Gtek adapter? Amazon doesn't let you know what one you're going to get.
If you're in the US, the one below shows that product name in the picture at least, as long as you pick the size "1G/2.5G/5G/10G-T: 30m".
This is just one of many the reasons why Amazon is a terrible store.
Does that actually work? Switch to SFP 10G then 10G to switch 2.5G? I didn't think that'd work right