Trunking between two HP ProCurve 1810G-24 v2 switches

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.
Hi, I want to setup a 2 port trunk connection between two of my HP ProCurve 1810G-24 v2 switches.
I am running software PL 1.9 on both switches.
I configure a trunk on port 1 and 2, and I connect port 1 and 2 of the two switches together.

As soon as I connect both ports, my network dies, I disconnect 1 of the two ports, and I can again access both switches.
The stats show almost 100% failure on packets sent on the trunk and the two ports.

I can connect either port 1 or port 2, no errors, but just not port 1 and port 2 at the same time.

I have flow control, jumbo frames, and green features enabled on both switches.

I tried:
- both sides LACP active, fails.
- one side LACP active one side LACP passive, fails.
- both sides static, fails.

What is going on, what am I doing wrong, I've done a similar config on the older v1 switches, never had such problems?

P.
 
I looked at the differences between my v1 switch and my v2 switches, and spanning tree protocol is in the v2 config, I enabled it, and no more dying when both ports are connected.
I really do not understand why I need to enable STP to get trunking to work, is enabling STP correlation or causation?

I currently have LACP active on one end and LACP passive on the other, is this the correct config for trunking these switches?

P.
 

NEO Dan

New Member
Sep 30, 2013
18
0
1
Ohio
I also have some 1800 series switches and I am unaware of any such feature, so I am curious. Is this a special switch to switch feature?
 
I finally figured out why I needed to enable STP at home but not at the office.

It was the (stupid / too smart for its own good) Sonos equipment that created its own proprietary wireless mesh network, and they use STP, and I also had all the Sonos equipment hardwired, resulting in multiple paths and mayhem when the switches did not have STP enabled.

I accidently discovered this when I disconnected one of the child-switches from the main-switch, and the equipment at the child-switch stayed connected to the network, turns out one of the pieces of equipment on that switch was a sonos amp that bridged over wireless mesh to the rest of network.

P.