Greetings everyone,
Been a while since you last heard from me, posting a few questions and answers (IBM 25R8071, LSI SAS3444E and related) in the "LSI RAID Controller - HBA Equivalency Mapping" thread. I just checked that thread to see how it's doing, and I'm most pleased to see it's still doing well indeed. Even more so as at least one member (Junior Member 'willko') benefited from finding this page, with info he needed for flashing his SAS3444E.
This time around my trouble is this one:
I recently fell into a widespread eBay trap, as unsuspected victim buying Seagate Constellation 2.5" 500GB SAS drives (ST9500430SS) for my external storage - backup and photo archive. Ending price was a bargain, which sadly turned into yet another hopeless search for "needle in a haystack" kind of informations.
It turned out (after Auction End, of course) that the drives are in fact IBM OEM - FRU:42D0708 (a.k.a. Seagate Constellation with IBM Firmware), offered in their System x server product line.
Anyway - long story told short :
I now have an LSI SAS3442E-R SAS HBA (original LSI, not HP version), which I plan to flash with IT-Firmware, as soon as I finish and run my build for the first time. What I don't know, is whether these IBM branded (OEM Firmware) SAS drives will work with my LSI SAS3442E-R, and if they do (I pray for a miracle..), I wonder whether the performance and/or functionality will be in any way limited or degraded ?!
I wish I knew if the drives can at least be flashed with original Seagate Firmware, but that's an answer I sure won't get from Seagate directly (tried that, and failed..) - once they sell the drives to OEMs, they literally deny their existence, and refuse to offer any kind of even most modest assistance.
Thanks in advance to any good soul, with a godsend word of reassurance !
Kind regards,
Sebastian
P.S.: A modest suggestion to admin: This kind of posts are crowding many forums all around (Seagate, IBM, Dell...), and with very very few exceptions, all those poor fellas usually don't receive any helpful replies, or non even. It's just my humble recommendation for a STICKY thread.
Been a while since you last heard from me, posting a few questions and answers (IBM 25R8071, LSI SAS3444E and related) in the "LSI RAID Controller - HBA Equivalency Mapping" thread. I just checked that thread to see how it's doing, and I'm most pleased to see it's still doing well indeed. Even more so as at least one member (Junior Member 'willko') benefited from finding this page, with info he needed for flashing his SAS3444E.
This time around my trouble is this one:
I recently fell into a widespread eBay trap, as unsuspected victim buying Seagate Constellation 2.5" 500GB SAS drives (ST9500430SS) for my external storage - backup and photo archive. Ending price was a bargain, which sadly turned into yet another hopeless search for "needle in a haystack" kind of informations.
It turned out (after Auction End, of course) that the drives are in fact IBM OEM - FRU:42D0708 (a.k.a. Seagate Constellation with IBM Firmware), offered in their System x server product line.
Anyway - long story told short :
I now have an LSI SAS3442E-R SAS HBA (original LSI, not HP version), which I plan to flash with IT-Firmware, as soon as I finish and run my build for the first time. What I don't know, is whether these IBM branded (OEM Firmware) SAS drives will work with my LSI SAS3442E-R, and if they do (I pray for a miracle..), I wonder whether the performance and/or functionality will be in any way limited or degraded ?!
I wish I knew if the drives can at least be flashed with original Seagate Firmware, but that's an answer I sure won't get from Seagate directly (tried that, and failed..) - once they sell the drives to OEMs, they literally deny their existence, and refuse to offer any kind of even most modest assistance.
Thanks in advance to any good soul, with a godsend word of reassurance !
Kind regards,
Sebastian
P.S.: A modest suggestion to admin: This kind of posts are crowding many forums all around (Seagate, IBM, Dell...), and with very very few exceptions, all those poor fellas usually don't receive any helpful replies, or non even. It's just my humble recommendation for a STICKY thread.