bought one several months ago, same item, same seller. no external rails.. just for reference. The seller is reliable also bought 846 from him 2 yrs ago.I'm in a somewhat similar situation except I'm looking to move my server from the tower it's currently hosted in to this kind of chassis. Things important to me:
The post by nephri was SUPER USEFUL. I poked around a bit and found the following listing and would appreciate folks' thoughts. I would plan to remove the existing MB and replace it with my SuperMicro X10-sl7, throw in a couple reverse breakouts. Might try to replace the 80mm fans with some 120s i have.
- I want to move my existing MB (X10-sl7) + e3-1245v3 + memory over.
- The above board has 8 sata ports which, as I understand, can be converted into two sas ports with a couple reverse breakout cables.
- I would prefer to deal with expanders as I don't want to mess around with a ton of SATA cables.
- I would be fine with moving over the ATX PSU currently in the tower but certainly that's not so important. More important is I don't want the wattage to go through the roof and, while it's in the garage, I'd rather not have it sound like a vacuum cleaner.
- For reference, my UPS says i'm pulling 120W right now... that includes a couple switches, a gateway, and cable modem.
- I'm using MergerFS right now and don't plan to move away from that for the primary storage system which means I don't need to have tons of disks spun up. Might do ZFS for some other stuff but that would come (much?) later
- Not sure how relevant this is but, I'm using ESXi on this and passing the storage straight through to the fileserver's VM. Dunno if any of the backplanes introduce issues
Any thoughts about why this might not work out well for me? Price is right but it seems quite a bit lower than what's been discussed so i'm worried i'm missing something.
2U Supermicro CSE-216 H8DME-2 24 Bay Server AMD QC 2.2GHz 16GB 4x 4GB | eBay
Yeah I've seem Tam around for a bit and not heard anything bad so I'm comfortable on that front. I'm less comfortable on the other stuffbought one several months ago, same item, same seller. no external rails.. just for reference. The seller is reliable also bought 846 from him 2 yrs ago.
Dont know what burgh means...Yeah I've seem Tam around for a bit and not heard anything bad so I'm comfortable on that front. I'm less comfortable on the other stuff
Are you from the 'burgh or is PGH your monogram?
PGH and 'burgh both mean Pittsburgh.Dont know what burgh means...
Start with post #2 in this thread. Do you have specific questions after reading it?I have an LSI 9260-8i and 8 4TB WD Reds. I am looking to transplant my setup into something with 20 - 24 bays. Can anyone recommend me a setup (maybe even an ebay link?) that would support this? I'd like Supermicro with 24 bays but the whole backplane thing is perplexing.
WD Reds are almost certainly SATA. In that case you probably don't want either of the SAS expander backplanes*. Although that means that you'd need to add another controller if you wanted to add more drives, and you couldn't have a hardware RAID that used drives from 2 or more controllers (although you can build additional RAID volumes from the added drives on the additional controllers). If you're OK with that, the vanilla backplane should be fine for you - it has SFF-8087 connectors, just like your existing controller. You could also use the TQ backplane with SFF-8087 breakout cables, but that's a bit messier and you may or may not get the SGPIO (extra LED per drive bay) working with a breakout cable.I have an LSI 9260-8i and 8 4TB WD Reds. I am looking to transplant my setup into something with 20 - 24 bays. Can anyone recommend me a setup (maybe even an ebay link?) that would support this? I'd like Supermicro with 24 bays but the whole backplane thing is perplexing.
Terry thanks a ton for the reply. So please forgive me, I am used to working with enterprise gear that is already paired with backplane/controller. I have a RAID50 VD built on my current 9260-8i which I am fine with not being able to extend on. I am looking at creating a small SSD pool for fast storage (RAID10, probably) but I would only use 4 disk or so (500G-1TB). That would come at a later date. Right now, I am about 85% full on ~22TB usable so I need to expand that and I want to stay w/ 3.5" 4TB disks. I would create another VD either RAID50 or RAID6. I run ESXi on this server so I would just present it as an additional datastore. You say "the vanilla backplane should be fine" - which is that? The TQ backplane sounds a lot like what I am doing now - I have SFF-8087 break out (4 sata plugs), so I am using two SFF-8087 to 8 SATA connectors in all. The drive LEDs are not critical to me as I document my disk and position by serial #.WD Reds are almost certainly SATA. In that case you probably don't want either of the SAS expander backplanes*. Although that means that you'd need to add another controller if you wanted to add more drives, and you couldn't have a hardware RAID that used drives from 2 or more controllers (although you can build additional RAID volumes from the added drives on the additional controllers). If you're OK with that, the vanilla backplane should be fine for you - it has SFF-8087 connectors, just like your existing controller. You could also use the TQ backplane with SFF-8087 breakout cables, but that's a bit messier and you may or may not get the SGPIO (extra LED per drive bay) working with a breakout cable.
If you're thinking of SSDs in the future, that's probably another reason to avoid an expander - your controller is a 6Gb/sec SAS2, while the newest generation is 12Gb/sec SAS3. You don't want the controller-to-expander path to be a bottleneck.
On the other hand, if you are giving serious thought to SSDs, a chassis with 3.5" drive bays can be a big waste of space if you're going to fill the slots with 2.5" SSDs.
* My experience with SATA drives behind SAS expanders is "it works fine - until it doesn't". It runs into trouble right when you don't want it to - if a drive hangs, the expander usually goes "Resets for everybody!" which causes additional drives to briefly drop offline (and out of the RAID array).
I meant the non-expander SFF-8087 backplane, which these days is often called "A". I don't know if it was always A or if that's a revision of a no-suffix backplane. TQ is the same as the A, except it has individual 7-pin connectors instead of the 4-drive SFF-8087 connectors. EL1 is a single-path expander while EL2 is a dual-path expander (which is only useful if you have SAS dual-port drives). This is from the SC836 chassis (3RU w/ 16-drive backplane). Other models may or may not offer all 4 flavors of backplane (for example, there's no real need for an expander on a 1RU 4-drive backplane).You say "the vanilla backplane should be fine" - which is that? The TQ backplane sounds a lot like what I am doing now - I have SFF-8087 break out (4 sata plugs), so I am using two SFF-8087 to 8 SATA connectors in all. The drive LEDs are not critical to me as I document my disk and position by serial #.
I'm pretty sure that almost all Dell chassis with > 8 drives have expanders built in. The NX3100 which uses the same chassis, motherboard, and PERC controller as the R510 definitely has an expander. If you've had success with generic SATA drives in that system, you may want to ignore my comment about SATA drives behind SAS expanders. In that case, either of the SAS2-xxxEL1 or SAS2-xxxEL2 backplanes would give you a similar setup to what you have in the R510. But if you're using SAS drives in the R510, that doesn't say anything about how SATA drives would perform in a similar configuration. When Dell sells SATA drives for the R510 / NX3100, each drive caddy has a SAS / SATA converter to get around the problem.I actually have a Dell R510 12-bay with LSI 9211 flashed to IT mode running as a bare metal FreeNAS box w/ 10 GbE, 64GB of RAM, etc., all doing NFS and iSCSI to a 2-host ESXi 6.5 cluster - so I am pretty decent with the actual storage layout/etc. I just need to figure out the Supermicro sorcery behind backplanes vs. chassis.
Generally, yes. It is best to get a backplane with the metal bracket, as sometimes Supermicro changes the way the backplane mounts to the bracket and you can run into problems with just the bare backplane board.Could I then just get a SAS2 backplane and swap it in?