I am fully conscious of the naivety of my question, and I have apologized in advance - hence I will not offer additional apologies. I am a professor of neuropathology, not a computer scientist. If I were one, I might not need to ask any questions.
CS grad students rarely come to my lab for their MSc or PhD. Nowadays they all want a path towards fintech, which I cannot offer. It's not easy to do cross-disciplinary science; the incentives for the young people are often insufficient.
I would suggest you pick the brains of those who suggested slurm to you as they might give additional details to their setups.
As it stands, having read back to your storage help request I think I have an idea of your lab config. I didn't mean to be rude but slurm and turn-key was a bit amusing. I realize this is far from your expertise but you will still have to learn a new workflow if you utilize slurm.
I am also not sure slurm is right for you, it is good for scaling but I am not sure you need it, it can take you from 2-3 boxes all the way to 10,000 nodes. My expertise is in the hardware side of hyperscale/supercomputer systems.
Are you still using 2 ingest boxes per
??
You could tie the 2 boxes together with slurm, giving work to each other...you could use those 2 boxes to give jobs to a new 3rd beefy box.
Or you could just build 2 beefier boxes without the additional learning of slurm.
The current hardware specs, and the processing file size and time of current tasks would be ideal in helping.