Samsung PM863/SM863 Discussion

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

Jeggs101

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2010
1,529
241
63
I saw today that the PM863 scales to 3.8TB. But at 1.92TB the $150 or so premium ($1099 PM or $1259 SM) i'd probably get the SM version and not deal with TLC.

Anyone planning to get one?
 

Deslok

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2015
1,122
125
63
34
deslok.dyndns.org
I'd love to but i don't have a good use case as of now, at 2k the 4tb drive is well enough priced to compete with mechanical storage for density, a 24 drive 2u enclosure would fit 96TB raw compared to 3u for the same capacity mechanical(although cost wise is another issue)

All that being said right now what i need/want are fast 12gbps SAS drives for cachecade
 

tigweld0101

Active Member
Apr 18, 2015
121
42
28
56
These are priced around $.50/gb. I can't wait until they sell for like the same as current pm853t's per gig. At $1k each I could see having two 3.8tb drives
 
  • Like
Reactions: T_Minus

neo

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2015
672
363
63
My next large SSD purchase(s) will be NVMe, AHCI's inevitable death is ever coming
 
  • Like
Reactions: T_Minus

T_Minus

Build. Break. Fix. Repeat
Feb 15, 2015
7,640
2,057
113
I can't see spending that for non NVME SSD in this new world we live in :D

Once price drops, then I'll take 48 4TB SSD LOL!!
 

Deslok

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2015
1,122
125
63
34
deslok.dyndns.org
even at that price they're attractive if you're paying per unit in a colocation they could certainly save some space. at the pricing of the PM835 i'm seing on ebay right now they'd be in the ~1300USD range which is quite the drop.
 

Patrick

Administrator
Staff member
Dec 21, 2010
12,513
5,803
113
Samsung SM863 and PM863 benchmarks first to post! Added a bunch of comparison drives that folks may have from HP servers or other places (e.g. ebay)

Also, expanded a bit from the typical test suite. One nice thing is that I now have 60+ SSDs benchmarked so it is easy to get comparison data now.
 

Patrick

Administrator
Staff member
Dec 21, 2010
12,513
5,803
113
big and fast, It's a shame they're limited to SATAIII I'm curious why there aren't more drives with a SAS12 controller
Only reason to do SAS3 is if you are trying to fit these in a scale up application to a large number of disks.

Small arrays/ web hosting - SATA is fine
Scale out - SATA is fine
Small scale up - SATA + PCIe/ NVMe
Performance - NVMe

SAS3 is slower than first gen NVMe so vendors are focusing on NVMe now and SATA for cheap/ big capcity.
 

Kneelbeforezod

Active Member
Sep 4, 2015
529
122
43
46
Given that PM863s are a cople of years old now are they a good buy for NVME with their current price point around 200 for the 2.5 form factor?
 

Evan

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,346
598
113
I have a PM863a in 3.84tb (and a few smaller down to 240gb)
Like them, solid drives, Low power, 7mm thick, cool running.
Price is good even new.

In hindsight I wish I had more of these rather than SAS3 drives due to the extra controller needed, heat, power etc.
 

croakz

Active Member
Nov 8, 2015
176
59
28
Seattle, WA
Agree with @Evan. I have some PM863s (960GB and 1.92TB) and a SAS3 PM1633 (3.84TB). Wish I got a larger PM863 vs the hassle of supporting a single SAS3 drive.
 

Evan

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,346
598
113
@croakz I think my SAS3,s are PM1633 in 960gb and PM1655 in 1.6tb , was tempted to try trading then for sata drives but figured it would be very hard since warranty etc with them being OEM drives.

I would prefer just to use NVMe when high performance is needed and s few big sata for everything else, and I can't really tell the performance difference between them and the SAS drives as my workload is light.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Son of Homer