I saw today that the PM863 scales to 3.8TB. But at 1.92TB the $150 or so premium ($1099 PM or $1259 SM) i'd probably get the SM version and not deal with TLC.
I'd love to but i don't have a good use case as of now, at 2k the 4tb drive is well enough priced to compete with mechanical storage for density, a 24 drive 2u enclosure would fit 96TB raw compared to 3u for the same capacity mechanical(although cost wise is another issue)
All that being said right now what i need/want are fast 12gbps SAS drives for cachecade
These are priced around $.50/gb. I can't wait until they sell for like the same as current pm853t's per gig. At $1k each I could see having two 3.8tb drives
even at that price they're attractive if you're paying per unit in a colocation they could certainly save some space. at the pricing of the PM835 i'm seing on ebay right now they'd be in the ~1300USD range which is quite the drop.
Agree with @Evan. I have some PM863s (960GB and 1.92TB) and a SAS3 PM1633 (3.84TB). Wish I got a larger PM863 vs the hassle of supporting a single SAS3 drive.
@croakz I think my SAS3,s are PM1633 in 960gb and PM1655 in 1.6tb , was tempted to try trading then for sata drives but figured it would be very hard since warranty etc with them being OEM drives.
I would prefer just to use NVMe when high performance is needed and s few big sata for everything else, and I can't really tell the performance difference between them and the SAS drives as my workload is light.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.