Radian RMS 200 and NVMe pool?

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

lmiksche

New Member
Apr 17, 2021
5
0
1
Hi everyone,

I have a dilema, I have got R630 server that came with the Radian RMS 200.
The plan is to use 4 NVMe drives Z1 or similar as storage and iSCSI target, possibly even running NVMe over C.E or TCP
Is the Radian of any use as cache or journal? Im a bit worried that it may actualy slow things down as the combined write/read speeds of the NVMes + the total IOPS may be greater then the Raians.

RMS DATA
https://www.radianmemory.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/RMS-200-Data-Sheet-ver-1-7.pdf
Samsung Drive Data:
https://download.semiconductor.samsung.com/resources/brochure/PM1733 NVMe SSD.pdf
 
Last edited:

i386

Well-Known Member
Mar 18, 2016
4,241
1,546
113
34
Germany
I have some radian rms 200 ssds. They are beasts and even faster than first gen optane (pcie) for 1qd/1thread.

Looking at the specsheets of the samsung ssds the radian should be fast enough to keep up with the samsung ssds most of the time (unless you run a pcie 4.0 system with many concurrent random reads...)
 

ano

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2022
649
269
63
should work, probably wont see much gains though , shouldnt slow down, if you have the hw, its easy to tst
 

lmiksche

New Member
Apr 17, 2021
5
0
1
Mind they will work as RAID so on read the performance will be quadrupled. So far PCIe 3. Will do some testing I guess.
 

gb00s

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2018
1,188
599
113
Poland
RMS200/300 are far superior, specially considering you have the Gen3 version of the PM1733 only. I have these set up in a RAID1 mode as write cache only and never look back to Optane 900/905 or so. Even 4800X is just equal performance wise. I also don't have any temp issues as many noticed using RMS200.