Post your R15 scores.
- Thread starter Patriot
- Start date
Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.
Digging out this thread with a few benchmarks for 2x AMD Epyc 7301 because I have some doubt about the numbers.
SMT enabled, all cores enabled, default affinity settings, "high performance" energy profile in Windows server 2016. 16x16GB DDR4-2133, Supermicro H11DSi.
1 thread: 108
8 threads: 827
16 threads: 1421
32 threads: 2606
64 threads: 4042
I actually had to enable the high performance energy profile, otherwise core performance boost remains disabled and all cores only run at 2.2GHz instead of 2.7GHz.
What really concerns me are the numbers for single Epyc 7301 you find on the internet: AMD Epyc 7301 - Benchmarks & CPU Vergleiche - CPU / Prozessor Vergleich - cpu-monkey
I know this is not the most reliable source, but lets assume the values are correct due to lack of other sources. 2709. Multiplying by 2 yields 5418 which is 31% higher than my score. I know I am using slow memory, but DDR4-2666 is only 25% faster than DDR4-2133 and Cinebench is known to be somewhat indifferent to memory speeds.
Dialing my memory back to DDR4-1333:
1 thread: 104
8 threads: 803
16 threads: 1361
32 threads: 2488
64 threads: 3826
I had similar results with Windows 10 which is why I tried a different OS. Any thoughts? I would have expected some numbers above 5000.
SMT enabled, all cores enabled, default affinity settings, "high performance" energy profile in Windows server 2016. 16x16GB DDR4-2133, Supermicro H11DSi.
1 thread: 108
8 threads: 827
16 threads: 1421
32 threads: 2606
64 threads: 4042
I actually had to enable the high performance energy profile, otherwise core performance boost remains disabled and all cores only run at 2.2GHz instead of 2.7GHz.
What really concerns me are the numbers for single Epyc 7301 you find on the internet: AMD Epyc 7301 - Benchmarks & CPU Vergleiche - CPU / Prozessor Vergleich - cpu-monkey
I know this is not the most reliable source, but lets assume the values are correct due to lack of other sources. 2709. Multiplying by 2 yields 5418 which is 31% higher than my score. I know I am using slow memory, but DDR4-2666 is only 25% faster than DDR4-2133 and Cinebench is known to be somewhat indifferent to memory speeds.
Dialing my memory back to DDR4-1333:
1 thread: 104
8 threads: 803
16 threads: 1361
32 threads: 2488
64 threads: 3826
I had similar results with Windows 10 which is why I tried a different OS. Any thoughts? I would have expected some numbers above 5000.
Last edited:
@alex_stief -- any chance you have another drive you can put Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS with HWE on? I have some good comparison data for 2P 7301.
I have enough drives for testing. Pardon my ignorance: How exactly would I run Cinebench on Linux?
I could get you to run c-ray with is similar (albeit better) and compare with systems we have.
I was just curious about Epyc performance on native windows. There are already enough Linux benchmarks for Epyc on this site.
I briefly installed 16.04.3 LTS and tried to add HWE. It told me that I was already running the latest hwe kernel which is 4.10something. If I read correctly, 4.14 is what we want for the latest improvements concerning AMD Epyc.
I briefly installed 16.04.3 LTS and tried to add HWE. It told me that I was already running the latest hwe kernel which is 4.10something. If I read correctly, 4.14 is what we want for the latest improvements concerning AMD Epyc.