Performance hit for Intel systems on the way...

Discussion in 'Processors and Motherboards' started by Drewy, Jan 2, 2018.

  1. Drewy

    Drewy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2016
    Messages:
    168
    Likes Received:
    23
  2. woodshop2300

    woodshop2300 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2016
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    18
    Yay intel scalable benchmarks round two!
     
    #2
  3. Evan

    Evan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2016
    Messages:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    452
    Also affects older than scalable right ? So all the E5 line ? Desktop ?
     
    #3
  4. K D

    K D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2016
    Messages:
    1,412
    Likes Received:
    301
    The article mentions all intel processors in the last decade.

    How is it that none of the other major outlets have not reported this yet? Theregister.co.uk is not where I expect to see this type of news first.
     
    #4
  5. dynamis31

    dynamis31 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2017
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    13
    #5
  6. woodshop2300

    woodshop2300 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2016
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    18
    Ewww so they are doing all that context switching regardless then..
    bet that becomes a kernel option really quick on the linux side at least.
     
    #6
  7. bash

    bash Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    21
    Maybe this is why the Intel CEO just sold a ton of stock.
     
    #7
  8. PigLover

    PigLover Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,786
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    It being reported everywhere...except on any sites with official Intel NDA access...

    Sent from my VS996 using Tapatalk
     
    #8
    K D likes this.
  9. vrod

    vrod Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2015
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    33
    Maybe intel is already paying off the medias to shut up? :D

    I see a huge shitstorm incoming as well as a big help for AMD to get back on the server market.
     
    #9
  10. Patrick

    Patrick Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,624
    Likes Received:
    4,580
    I have a feeling this is going to be something where we see a rushed patch then performance improvement over time.

    The harder bit is trying to sort out what we will do for benchmarking since I like to have comparable numbers. One option now is hope Ubuntu 18.04 has the patch and enough performance tuning, then re-run everything based on that LTS version.

    Another side is that there are also three performance cases. One where this has little impact. One where this has an impact to performance but not in a manner that pushes you out of SLAs. A third where you are pushed outside of SLAs and need more hardware because of performance per machine is lower.
     
    #10
    TedB and eva2000 like this.
  11. pricklypunter

    pricklypunter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2015
    Messages:
    1,546
    Likes Received:
    442
    Argh...the ol' unintended consequences of what seemed like a good idea at the time...
    I can totally see Intel giving away a lot of free stuff over the next year or two, like chips, warranties, employees and etc :p:D
     
    #11
  12. mstone

    mstone Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2015
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    117
    I doubt it--the TLB hit is essential to the workaround, and is what it is.
     
    #12
  13. wildpig1234

    wildpig1234 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2016
    Messages:
    1,625
    Likes Received:
    194
    so does that mean all of the 2011 v1, v2, v3, v4? what about my laptop with the latest i5 and i7 8th gen? or i guess now all my atom tablets and 2 in 1 will even be slower?:(
     
    #13
  14. Evan

    Evan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2016
    Messages:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    452
    Going to be really interesting to see how our big SfB, MSX, SQL, Oracle, etc systems look post patch, we certainly have some systems that we may need more hardware where performance is lower, eg MSX servers are really loaded with say 8000 mailboxes because that’s what it could run due to either cpu or storage performance. Also Oracle systems where your extracting the most value possible of the 2 x 4-core cpu’s by having lots of memory and I/O just using the whole CPU.
    Not that we run SAP HANA on intel but I could imagine this is another area some may run into trouble.

    Fun times ahead.
     
    #14
  15. ecosse

    ecosse Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    361
    Likes Received:
    60
    Its going to be real interesting to see the results in the multi-tenant space. Say for instance I've built a virtualised SQL / Oracle farm and licensed the blade on cores with overcommitted. Now say that this patch means another blade is required. Cost models are going to change as a result of this. Feel happy for AMD!
     
    #15
  16. Ozymand

    Ozymand New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    4
    Unfortunately for AMD, they're probably going to get thrown under the bus with Intel as most OS providers appear to take any x86-64 platform and consider it unsecure. AMD has been lobbying for Linux to put in an exception for them, but it has not been accepted.

    As for Microsoft, I figure they're going to take the simple path and do the same. Which means the hit that Intel takes, AMD is going to take as well (and in some cases, it might be worse if they're optimizing towards Intel as the target platform).
     
    #16
  17. im2geek4you

    im2geek4you Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2017
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    10
    Damn it ... I just bought a couple of Intel Xeon CPU's today... :(
     
    #17
  18. wildpig1234

    wildpig1234 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2016
    Messages:
    1,625
    Likes Received:
    194
    AMD says to not apply the patch to computers using their CPU. So for this time, they might get away with better performance if the patch is optionally not applied.

    But future O/S vers that would have the patch built in if there is no exception to not apply the patch then they would be hit as well.
     
    #18
  19. Patrick

    Patrick Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    11,624
    Likes Received:
    4,580
    Just as an example, OSX 10.13.2 was patched for KPTI in early December, 10.13.3 is going to have additional tweaks.
     
    #19
  20. Ozymand

    Ozymand New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    4
    From what I've seen you can command-line bypass the changes in Linux if you're using a AMD processor, I just don't know if Microsoft is going to be so amenable. We can probably dodge the initial patch (if truth be told, this coming Tuesday), but imagine at some point there will be some mandatory security roll-up that will also include this. It'll become a fun game of "dodge the patch" for those AMD systems if it is to be avoided.
     
    #20
Similar Threads: Performance Intel
Forum Title Date
Processors and Motherboards Intel Atom E3815 Performance Feb 10, 2015
Processors and Motherboards AMD Epyc ROME Memory Population Performance - 4 or 8 RDIMMs? Dec 6, 2019
Processors and Motherboards Supermicro poor NVMe SSD performance in Linux Oct 5, 2019
Processors and Motherboards Performance difference between Gold 5218, 6230 and 6248 Sep 14, 2019
Processors and Motherboards Is there a server CPU that compares to the Threadripper in both price/performance? Apr 12, 2019

Share This Page