We have two separate dual-controller 10GbE iSCSI SAN's (VESS R2600tiD) on the network and have found that when more than one user is writing 8K uncompressed (4:4:4) 12-bit video data out (approx. 9Gb/s) to their LUN (virtual iSCSI drive) it overloads the Network Bandwidth quickly. Since there would never be more than 3 user stations capable of writing out 8K video data simultaneously, then providing 40Gbs uplink between switches would allow write devices (source PC's) and their local switch to write out to (target iSCSI SAN) always at full 10Gb/s write rate actual is RAID storage is).
So need to purchase at least qty (3) Network Switches with preferred configuration of 8-ports 10GBASE-T and 1-port or 2-ports of 40Gbs QSFP+. However if that small a switch size isn't and option then a 16-port or 24-port version of the same 10GBASE-T capability and at least qty (1) 40Gbs would be fine. Could also substitute 100Gbs uplink to run between them if cost differential between 40Gbs & 100Gbs wasn't two great. The maximum distance the Fiber cable would have to run is 100 meters. Need each switch to be accessible through an http based GUI so as to monitor port status and bandwidth.
So need to purchase at least qty (3) Network Switches with preferred configuration of 8-ports 10GBASE-T and 1-port or 2-ports of 40Gbs QSFP+. However if that small a switch size isn't and option then a 16-port or 24-port version of the same 10GBASE-T capability and at least qty (1) 40Gbs would be fine. Could also substitute 100Gbs uplink to run between them if cost differential between 40Gbs & 100Gbs wasn't two great. The maximum distance the Fiber cable would have to run is 100 meters. Need each switch to be accessible through an http based GUI so as to monitor port status and bandwidth.