814h/s is a bit low for E5-2670.Hello,
First would like to thanks this website and all the contributors of this superb topic! i didnt read all the pages yet but it's the only place I found on google with very useful informations.
I have a sleeping dual Xeon 2670 v1 and wanted to test CPU mining.
Configuration is:
2x 2670
64Gb ram
SSD
XMR Stak CPU
minerXMR - 200000 difficulty - port 3333
Windows 10
I got like 814 H/s. I think my config file isnt really good since I had a lot of problem making it but went from 200 to 814 and thanks to your forum it seems 814 is normal for a dual 2670.
But i wonder why i only use 50% of the CPU Power and half of the core? On task manager and other application i can see 50-55% CPU use. Is it normal?
Thanks!
[2017-07-01 01:31:56] accepted: 184/184 (100.00%), 5238.64 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 01:32:00] accepted: 185/185 (100.00%), 5227.32 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 01:32:01] accepted: 186/186 (100.00%), 5224.12 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 01:32:01] accepted: 187/187 (100.00%), 5226.51 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 02:58:47] accepted: 18/18 (100.00%), 876.65 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 02:59:05] accepted: 19/19 (100.00%), 878.25 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 02:59:08] accepted: 20/20 (100.00%), 878.29 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 02:59:17] accepted: 21/21 (100.00%), 878.33 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 02:59:26] accepted: 22/22 (100.00%), 878.20 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 02:59:37] accepted: 23/23 (100.00%), 878.29 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 03:00:00] accepted: 24/24 (100.00%), 897.02 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 03:00:57] accepted: 25/25 (100.00%), 878.34 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 03:01:17] accepted: 26/26 (100.00%), 879.32 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 03:01:33] accepted: 27/27 (100.00%), 877.96 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
[2017-07-01 03:01:36] accepted: 28/28 (100.00%), 877.82 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
New single node world record?
Code:[2017-07-01 01:31:56] accepted: 184/184 (100.00%), 5238.64 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!) [2017-07-01 01:32:00] accepted: 185/185 (100.00%), 5227.32 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!) [2017-07-01 01:32:01] accepted: 186/186 (100.00%), 5224.12 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!) [2017-07-01 01:32:01] accepted: 187/187 (100.00%), 5226.51 H/s at diff 10000 (yay!!!)
When you say VMs, I think VMware. I'm not sure how the other OS's do virtualization, but I can tell you that with VMware, smaller is better for core count. You'd have better overall performance running 40 VMs with 2 cores than 4 VMs with 20 cores. This is just because VMware wont release resources until all the requested resources are available.hi guys, i'm just starting on this and i've got a few questions.
1. what's the recommended miner? it seems wolf's miner is being used on some of the posts, is it still the best miner to use?
2. any difference on windows vs linux mining hash rate?
3. is baremetal mining more optimized than with vm? let's say if I have 4 socket, 20 core/cpu machine, i was wondering the performance difference of 80 cores baremetal vs let say 4 VM's running 20 cores each(or maybe 40 vcpus each with HT.
thanks!