And 3.10.4606 is not 3.10.4XXX?I thought the Spectrum x86 switches only supported 3.10.4XXX
And 3.10.4606 is not 3.10.4XXX?I thought the Spectrum x86 switches only supported 3.10.4XXX
Didn't know why I had such a brain fart right there, I somehow thought it only support 3.10.44xx so my switch is on 4408And 3.10.4606 is not 3.10.4XXX?![]()
You can DM me. I might be able to helpI'd like to ask if anyone has a .bin file for Cumulus 5.11 or later.
# ip addr
.....
2: mgmt0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
link/ether e4:1d:2d:cd:be:8a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.99.99.6/30 brd 10.99.99.7 scope global mgmt0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fd33:58bc:59a0:9991::6/126 scope global
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::e61d:2dff:fecd:be8a/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
.....
# ip -6 route
fd33:58bc:59a0:9991::4/126 dev mgmt0 proto kernel metric 256
fe80::/64 dev mgmt0 proto kernel metric 256
default via fe80::1 dev mgmt0 proto ra metric 1024 expires 1749sec hoplimit 64
# ping6 -I mgmt0 fe80::1
PING fe80::1(fe80::1) from fe80::e61d:2dff:fecd:be8a mgmt0: 56 data bytes
64 bytes from fe80::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.343 ms
64 bytes from fe80::1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.309 ms
^C
--- fe80::1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.309/0.326/0.343/0.017 ms
# ping6 fd33:58bc:59a0:9991::5
PING fd33:58bc:59a0:9991::5(fd33:58bc:59a0:9991::5) 56 data bytes
^C
--- fd33:58bc:59a0:9991::5 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1007ms
# show int mgmt0
Interface mgmt0 status:
Comment :
Admin up : yes
Link up : yes
DHCP running : no
IP address : 10.99.99.6
Netmask : 255.255.255.252
IPv6 enabled : yes
Autoconf enabled: yes
Autoconf route : yes
Autoconf privacy: no
DHCPv6 running : yes (but no valid lease)
IPv6 addresses : 2
IPv6 address:
fd33:58bc:59a0:9991::6/126
fe80::e61d:2dff:fecd:be8a/64
Speed : 1000Mb/s (auto)
Duplex : full (auto)
Interface type : ethernet
Interface source: physical
MTU : 1500
HW address : E4:1D:2D:CD:BE:8A
##
## Network interface configuration
##
interface ib0 ip address 0.0.0.0 /0
interface ib0 shutdown
no interface mgmt0 dhcp
interface mgmt0 ip address 10.99.99.6 /30
##
## Network interface IPv6 configuration
##
interface mgmt0 ipv6 address autoconfig
interface mgmt0 ipv6 address fd33:58bc:59a0:9991::6/126
interface ethernet 1/1/48
port-name swmlnx-mgmt0
route-only
ip address 10.99.99.5 255.255.255.252
ip ospf area 0
ipv6 address fe80::1 link-local
ipv6 address fd33:58bc:59a0:9991::5/126
ipv6 enable
ipv6 ospf area 0
ipv6 dhcp-relay destination fd33:58bc:59a0:2301::10
ipv6 dhcp-relay destination fd33:58bc:59a0:2301::11
ipv6 dhcp-relay include-options interface-id remote-id
ipv6 nd other-config-flag
ipv6 nd prefix-advertisement fd33:58bc:59a0:9991::4/126 43200 21600 onlink
no spanning-tree
no flow-control
stp-bpdu-guard
The Aristas have 12MB (or 16MB for Trident2+) shared buffer per ASIC. Most Arista 7050X have only one ASIC.I'm comparing to Arista 40GbE capable switches that list 32MB
Thank you,The Aristas have 12MB (or 16MB for Trident2+) shared buffer per ASIC. Most Arista 7050X have only one ASIC.
SX series:
Per Port fixed size 128 KB for 40/56 Gb/s ports and 64 KB for SFP+ ports
That’s nonsense.I was looking more at the Arista 7280 series. I need at most 6 40GbE ports for a 5-Node Proxmox/CEPH build and from some discussions on reddit, I should be aiming for 32-64MB and greater buffer.
I am wondering how loud is the CCR2116-12G-4S+.Another question regarding Mellanox SX6012:
- I'm planing to connect this switch and Mikrotik CCR2116-12G-4S+ with QSFP+ to 4xSFP+ breakout cable (Mikrotik has 4 x SFP+ port) and to do interface bonding, to get 40Gbit between those two devices. In theory it should work. Anyone have any experience in similar matter ?
Thanks
This is the setup I have running CCR2116 with MLAG to 2x 6036. It is as quiet as the SX6036 as you hear the air but not a fan whine. Remember any one connection will only be able to do max 10G 4x10G != 1x40GI am wondering how loud is the CCR2116-12G-4S+.
I was running into problems trying to update my SX1024 over the webUI (kept getting a connection reset error after a few minutes), so I tried sftp and the same thing kept happening, so I decided to put the firmware files on a FAT32 USB drive and plug it into the back. I can see the USB drive appearing in the logs but the above command and the one on the webUI (the update field with scp://admin@localhost/var/mnt/usb1/image.img and the password field filled with my admin pw), keep telling me there's no file or directory. I have the file(s) on the root of the only partition (4GB) on the USB drive. Tried running it on the webUI and the image fetch on the terminal but no dice so far.. what am I missing?- To download firmware from an USB stick, useimage fetch scp://admin:admin@127.0.0.1/var/mnt/usb1/image-X86_64-3.10.4404.img
Only eth can be loaded, sx1024 has no corresponding vpi model (sx60**) that can be convertedSX1024
Really? This goes against what the Nvidia whitepaper says:Only eth can be loaded, sx1024 has no corresponding vpi model (sx60**) that can be converted
Is the dual core 1.4G Celeron powerful to handle 3Gbit WAN?I finally acquired an SN2010 and started messing around with the various OS options. Just for fun, I stuck OpenWRT on it. There are instructions on their wiki to install the firmware and kernel modules needed for the switch, generally pretty easy. There were a few extra tweaks, like I had to write a script to get usable names for the ports, mess with the default bridges, disable dhcp, edit some minor config files to get things to show up in the web UI. Overall, works fine, since it's just Linux. Mellanox did an astonishingly good job of upstreaming all their code AND documenting how to configure stuff (on github), so I think everything you can do in Onyx is doable without it (though probably less convenient). Even fans, LEDs, and temperatures are all working perfectly.
Anyway, it's a weirdly viable option, especially if you're familiar with OpenWRT already.
I kind of doubt it. I don't think he flashed OpenWrt on it to use it as a router. It was presumably only a way to get switch functionality with an up-to-date software stack.Is the dual core 1.4G Celeron powerful to handle 3Gbit WAN?