Intel Xeon E5-2686 V3 QS QG7V 18 Core 36 Thread 45mb L3 120w 3.5Ghz Turbo CPU $750 OBO

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

Asad

New Member
Aug 7, 2017
12
0
1
39
http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Xeon/Intel-Xeon E5-2686 v3.html

This CPU is the PERFECT balance between power consumption and performance and is RARE to find as it is the QS (qualification sample) and has identical stepping (C0) and functionality as the OEM/retail version

This CPU was used lightly and rarely had higher than 10% utilization. Ran for a few hours a day (not 24 hours/day)


It uses 25W lower power consumption than all of the other 18 core E5 v3/v4processors (except for the E5-2695 V4) and costs less!!


The E5-2695 V4 is closest in clock speed/turbo speed/TDP to this CPU, but it is more expensive and has a 200MHz lower turbo!!


upload_2017-12-22_11-1-54.png


Pulled from service, tested and guaranteed 100% working with no stability issues, and placed into storage

Photos and benchmarks are of actual item, your benchmark results may vary depending on your configuration

Supports virtualization when enabled in BIOS and tested with VMs

This is a QS (qualification sample) processor and has identical stepping (C0) and functionality as the OEM/retail version

Thoroughly tested with an Asrock X99 Fatality X99m and Supermicro X10SRA-F and works great

PAYMENT: Paypal only
SHIPPING: Product will ship to registered Paypal addresses in the USA. Shipped from New Jersey, USA
RETURNS: No returns


 

AJXCR

Active Member
Jan 20, 2017
565
96
28
35
You're missing a transistor in the lower left hand corner (2nd pic). I've run several chips this way long term with no ill effect.

What is your CB score with these? Turbo bins are worth noting..

Xeon E5-2686 v3**18**2 GHz**3/3/3/3/3/3/3/6/7/8/9/10/11/12/13/14/15/15**18 × 256 KiB**45 MiB**120 W**LGA 2011-3**2 × 9.6 GT/s QPI**4 × DDR3-1866**4 × DDR4-2133**Sep 8, 2014

Xeon E5-2696 v3**18**2.3 GHz**5/5/5/5/5/5/5/5/6/7/8/9/10/11/12/13/15/15**18 × 256 KiB**45 MiB**145 W**LGA 2011-3**2 × 9.6 GT/s QPI**4 × DDR4-2133**Sep 8, 2014

Xeon E5-2699 v3**18**2.3 GHz**5/5/5/5/5/5/5/5/5/5/6/7/8/9/10/11/13/13**18 × 256 KiB**45 Mi**145 W**LGA 2011-3**2 × 9.6 GT/s QPI**4 × DDR4-2133**Sep 8, 2014
 

Asad

New Member
Aug 7, 2017
12
0
1
39
Thanks for noticing the transistor, I never really noticed it before you pointed it out. Haven't had any problems with the CPU at all.

2098 Cinebench, of course this will be different based on your configuration.
 

sparx

Active Member
Jul 16, 2015
320
118
43
Sweden
Uhm. Thats not a transistor guys. Its a capacitor. And its used for smoothing out the core power. All SKUs have the same population, so lower power cpus will have same as higher power cpus. So the missing cap will not affect the performance or stability of the cpu. There are lots of caps and also lots of caps on the motherboard doing the same thing.
 

AJXCR

Active Member
Jan 20, 2017
565
96
28
35
Uhm. Thats not a transistor guys. Its a capacitor. And its used for smoothing out the core power. All SKUs have the same population, so lower power cpus will have same as higher power cpus. So the missing cap will not affect the performance or stability of the cpu. There are lots of caps and also lots of caps on the motherboard doing the same thing.

Good catch... not sure where I pulled transistor from. Last time I spent any time on it was here:
Damaged Processor Questions
 

Sable

Active Horse
Oct 19, 2016
392
112
43
29
The chip here can all core turbo to 3.5, one of the best v3 chips.
 

AJXCR

Active Member
Jan 20, 2017
565
96
28
35
Are you sure its all core turbo?
I'm a little curious about this as well.. I've seen this mentioned in numerous places, but also have seen reports (even on STH) that users were unable to achieve these results.

OP: Any chance you would be willing to demonstrate this?
 

BigDaddy

Member
Aug 8, 2016
38
20
8
I'm a little curious about this as well.. I've seen this mentioned in numerous places, but also have seen reports (even on STH) that users were unable to achieve these results.

OP: Any chance you would be willing to demonstrate this?

I have 2x QG7V. The all core is 2.3. The turboboost bios mod can get it up to 2.8ghz all-core in a dual socket config for ~20% gain in cinebench. It is a great chip, good boost clock and decent all core. I got mine before a bit over a year ago for about half that, before people saw the value. The price seems high, they go for ~600 imo. If one can get 750 that out of them, I'd sell both of mine and buy an i9 and consolidate threads. For price, a 1920x (or a 1950x on sale) would give higher single and all core performance with ecc support available on boards.
 

Sable

Active Horse
Oct 19, 2016
392
112
43
29
I have a S2600WTT server with 2 x E5-2690 v3 ES. If i remember correctly, after the bios mod the chips all core turboed (12 cores 2x)to 3.4 or 3.5 without a problem, not even heating up that much. Now i have them sitting in a supermicro server board which i wanted to build a workstation with but something is up with the fanspeed, i can't get it to turn down:mad: (no mods).

The chips are fairly rare, as they are ES processors with the production code QFRX, not QGNY, which is more common and a QS. Maybe there is a diffrence between the ES chips and the production chips in terms of limits.

I am wondering whether the 2690v3 would beat the 2686v3 ^^.
 
Last edited:

ideabox

Member
Dec 11, 2016
69
25
18
37
I have a S2600WTT server with 2 x E5-2690 v3 ES. If i remember correctly, after the bios mod the chips all core turboed (12 cores 2x)to 3.4 or 3.5 without a problem, not even heating up that much.
Any links to the "Bios Mod"
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigatexal

Sable

Active Horse
Oct 19, 2016
392
112
43
29
Don’t be an ass. This bios sounds too good to be true. Post a screenshot of all the cores boosting to 3.5ghz?
Why do you assume i am being an ass? I don't really want to defend my position, do some research if you want to know more about it though.