I don't know about ridiculous, at least not with current generation products. The Intel X520-SR2 (fiber card) is 6.9 watts while Intel X540-T2 (BaseT card) is 9.8 watts, and while I'm not sure about the Intel, most 10GBaseT solutions have a low-power mode for short cables that saves even more power.Latency does limit your peak bandwidth unless you are doing pure large block sequential work.
I suppose if you look at it from the perspective of the NFS server, with 100 clients, the latency could be additive as far as buffer fill (which could add latency). Once buffers congest packets drop and big mess with delayed ack/windowed protocols.
Plus the power of base-T is ridiculous
I'm still a fan of SFP+ myself, but I have to admit that BaseT is now a quite viable solution, and an Ethernet cable is just so darn familiar to everyone, and therefore appealing.
Last edited: