Gone - 3.84TB Micron 5100 ECO SATA SSD - $250 OBO (eBay)

Notice: Page may contain affiliate links for which we may earn a small commission through services like Amazon Affiliates or Skimlinks.

Evan

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,346
598
113
They are pretty poor performing drives, for sure aimed at cheap storage and they are SATA , i have some, just use them for regular storage like photos and files, replaced spinning disks good while back. For that they are good.
 

Marsh

Moderator
May 12, 2013
2,645
1,496
113
After SSD firmware update, write performance increase to perform like a regular SATA 3 SSD now.

Test file size 16gb

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 7.0.0 x64 (C) 2007-2019 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World: Crystal Dew World
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes

[Read]
Sequential 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 536.198 MB/s [ 511.4 IOPS] < 15611.69 us>
Sequential 1MiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 496.412 MB/s [ 473.4 IOPS] < 2111.00 us>
Random 4KiB (Q= 32, T=16): 356.945 MB/s [ 87144.8 IOPS] < 5869.51 us>
Random 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 27.435 MB/s [ 6698.0 IOPS] < 148.69 us>

[Write]
Sequential 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 481.979 MB/s [ 459.7 IOPS] < 17340.30 us>
Sequential 1MiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 431.159 MB/s [ 411.2 IOPS] < 2428.64 us>
Random 4KiB (Q= 32, T=16): 172.667 MB/s [ 42155.0 IOPS] < 12125.42 us>
Random 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 108.610 MB/s [ 26516.1 IOPS] < 37.50 us>

Profile: Default
Test: 16 GiB (x5) [Interval: 5 sec] <DefaultAffinity=DISABLED>
Date: 2020/06/27 7:38:15
OS: Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18363] (x64)


Test file size 64gb

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 7.0.0 x64 (C) 2007-2019 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World: Crystal Dew World
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes

[Read]
Sequential 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 532.423 MB/s [ 507.8 IOPS] < 15718.99 us>
Sequential 1MiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 481.314 MB/s [ 459.0 IOPS] < 2176.37 us>
Random 4KiB (Q= 32, T=16): 375.922 MB/s [ 91777.8 IOPS] < 5574.15 us>
Random 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 29.691 MB/s [ 7248.8 IOPS] < 137.53 us>

[Write]
Sequential 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 468.138 MB/s [ 446.5 IOPS] < 17847.57 us>
Sequential 1MiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 432.036 MB/s [ 412.0 IOPS] < 2423.77 us>
Random 4KiB (Q= 32, T=16): 177.284 MB/s [ 43282.2 IOPS] < 11810.58 us>
Random 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 108.954 MB/s [ 26600.1 IOPS] < 37.41 us>

Profile: Default
Test: 64 GiB (x5) [Interval: 5 sec] <DefaultAffinity=DISABLED>
Date: 2020/06/27 7:45:58
OS: Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18363] (x64)
 

Quartermaster

Right, now pay attention 007!
Jun 3, 2020
58
36
18
Long shot, but I have a little time spare... If anyone wants some RAID performance metrics, I have 8x of these in RAID6 on a PERC H730P in a Dell PowerEdge R340 with a E-2136 and 128GB of RAM that is not being provisioned for another day or so.

I can do a quick generic Ubuntu server install and run some scripts (or just a few FIO runs), write in detail what you want below (including PERC write-back/write through preference, read-ahead settings etc) and I'll try to bang it out before I deploy it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marsh