Is that at UEFI shell waiting for input? Or with Linux running?@MSameer That is definitely not normal. I measured 29/30W for EC1 model.
Is that at UEFI shell waiting for input? Or with Linux running?@MSameer That is definitely not normal. I measured 29/30W for EC1 model.
Linux booted idle. I have noticed some servers in UEFI do consume a lot of power but if you boot into OS power consumption will be lower.Is that at UEFI shell waiting for input? Or with Linux running?
I will wait for it then to finish the memtest rounds (66 watts heater mode), install Linux and see.Linux booted idle. I have noticed some servers in UEFI do consume a lot of power but if you boot into OS power consumption will be lower.
How did you came to this information? Any links or RSS to subscribe to?New BMC Firmware is availible 12.61.39
I had the same issue over the weekend. I uploaded the wrong image into the firmware flashing tool, and after it told me off and reverted it wouldn't come up on the network again.i have an issue with the web ui of my board. I connected to it first time and enabled all one touch firewall (basic) settings. afterwards i was not able to access the web ui anymore. It is reachable via ipmitool but really want the web interface to be available again. Can someone help me with that?
currently i am connected directly with static IPs.
what i tried:
cold reset through ipmi tool
clearing cmos (but the ipmi has its own flash i think)
removing battery for a couple of hours.
there is also a jtag interface but i do not know the pinout. i saw in one post that it was used for serial communication. Is it SWD?
thanks in advance!
ipmitool.Disabling VLAN tagging, enabling it and restarting the MC made it come up again on the correct VLAN but it didn't listen on HTTP.lighttpd (something similar to (network.c.290) setsockopt: No such device and some digging around with Ghidra (unfortunately it is a modified version of Lighttpd 1.4.35 so the upstream source code didn't help me) it turns out that it gets the network interface to listen to from /conf/ncml.conf, which was incorrect in relation to my actual VLAN tag (interface_name=bond0.1 rather than interface_name=bond0.201).Is there also a way to get a newer Bios? In this package is a Bios but its not compatible right?MJ11 use AST2500 AMI which is same as use motherboard MC12 and user zr0dfx write in MC12 thread that new FW is availible... So periodic chck on gigabyte support site of MC12 board if there is new FW do job but it can be also parsed by some script and send you notification ...
You talk about BMC fw, not BIOS fw, right?MJ11 use AST2500 AMI which is same as use motherboard MC12 and user zr0dfx write in MC12 thread that new FW is availible... So periodic chck on gigabyte support site of MC12 board if there is new FW do job but it can be also parsed by some script and send you notification ...
I'm not sure what's being asked here with respect to the "more PCIe lanes than x1"Is someone aware of a riser for the slimsas connector that is economical for more PCI-E lanes than x1?
Are there any experiences using different types of ASM2824 cards like the ones meant for M.2 drives?
For example something like this https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005005812978939.html
Additionally what should currently be the most economical option for two x4 lanes? Should one of the slimsas PCI-E cards work with a riser with the crossflashed bios and bifurcation enabled?
This seems unlikely as the MJ11 is based on Zen+ and the latest MC12 BIOSes doesn't support older than Zen2, IIRC.BMC is working fine acording to _Dejan_ but im asking about Bios if there is a possibility![]()
gigabyte's BMC FW is universal to all motherboards with same BMC chip(e.g. AST2500)BMC is working fine acording to _Dejan_ but im asking about Bios if there is a possibility![]()
Could a kind soul post a link to the updated BMC firmware that could be used on the MJ11 boards
use the link from e.g. MC12-LE0gigabyte's BMC FW is universal to all motherboards with same BMC chip(e.g. AST2500)
