So I'm going to upgrade my current Nas4Free box which runs off a very low Sata count intel desktop board. I am going for a higher SATA port count board with about 10-14 ports and will also get a SAS expander as well for future drives. Will put this in a norco 4224. I have 12 drives right now.
I have multiple ZFS pool with mirror vdev's currently.
My question is for ram/zfs which places decision on which MB. Most MB can only accept 32GB ram max, and only a handful like true server boards 2011 and ones with dual/quad processor can do 192GB or more memory. It's overkill because NAS4Free works fine with even 3.0ghz dual core Pentium. So I don't really need the processing power, I just want the board that has more slots and memory.
I have 32GB now, currently about 12TB space. I know you should allocate 1GB per 1TB (doesn't include dedup which I don't use)
So realistically I can only put up to around 29-30TB of space.. maybe 27-28 to be safe.
That's a bad limit if I want to ever expand more space. Should I then just go for a MB that has ability to do 64GB+? Or I'm just overkilling the ZFS?
I have multiple ZFS pool with mirror vdev's currently.
My question is for ram/zfs which places decision on which MB. Most MB can only accept 32GB ram max, and only a handful like true server boards 2011 and ones with dual/quad processor can do 192GB or more memory. It's overkill because NAS4Free works fine with even 3.0ghz dual core Pentium. So I don't really need the processing power, I just want the board that has more slots and memory.
I have 32GB now, currently about 12TB space. I know you should allocate 1GB per 1TB (doesn't include dedup which I don't use)
So realistically I can only put up to around 29-30TB of space.. maybe 27-28 to be safe.
That's a bad limit if I want to ever expand more space. Should I then just go for a MB that has ability to do 64GB+? Or I'm just overkilling the ZFS?